On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 01:03:06PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Bill Allombert writes:
>
> > This make four seconds so far, so the proposal is accepted.
>
> > Proposed by Santiago Vila
> > Seconded: Russ Allbery
> > Seconded: Luk Claes
> > Seconded: Raphael Hertzog
Bill Allombert writes:
> This make four seconds so far, so the proposal is accepted.
> Proposed by Santiago Vila
> Seconded: Russ Allbery
> Seconded: Luk Claes
> Seconded: Raphael Hertzog
> Seconded: Steve Langasek
> I have created a branch bug582495-ballom
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 01:27:38PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 08:26:46PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > On Fri, 21 May 2010, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > > Known affected packages: adduser, base-files
> > > Fix: Trivial: s/2/5/
>
> > > I'm looking for seconds for
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 01:27:38PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Does anyone think there's a need for another reserved ID range somewhere
> above 16 bits to replace this one?
Well, we could just reserve the upper half of the 32 bit space (and
document 2^32-2 as (NFS) nobody and 2^32-1 as don't us
On 05/21/2010 08:17 PM, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Santiago Vila writes:
>
>> Alternatively, we could try to improve the current status a little bit
>> for squeeze.
>
>> (A system admin with about 45000 users in his system asked me about
>> the new /etc/profile and the apparently arbitrary limit of 2
Steve Langasek writes:
> On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 08:26:46PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>> On Fri, 21 May 2010, Santiago Vila wrote:
>>> Known affected packages: adduser, base-files
>>> Fix: Trivial: s/2/5/
>>> I'm looking for seconds for this proposal.
>> Seconded.
> Seconded.
> Do
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 08:26:46PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Fri, 21 May 2010, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > Known affected packages: adduser, base-files
> > Fix: Trivial: s/2/5/
> > I'm looking for seconds for this proposal.
> Seconded.
Seconded.
Does anyone think there's a need fo
merge 161912 582495
quit
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 12:15:04PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> Hmm, I see this is already reported as Bug#161912.
>
> However, this report includes a patch :-)
>
> Feel free to merge them anyway.
Done.
Cheers,
--
Bill.
Imagine a large red swirl here.
--
To UNS
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> merge 161912 582495
Bug#161912: Drop 3-5 uid/gid reservation
Bug#582495: debian-policy: extend UID range of user accounts
Merged 161912 582495.
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
582495
On Fri, 21 May 2010, Santiago Vila wrote:
> Known affected packages: adduser, base-files
> Fix: Trivial: s/2/5/
>
> I'm looking for seconds for this proposal.
Seconded.
Cheers,
--
Raphaël Hertzog
Like what I do? Sponsor me: http://ouaza.com/wp/2010/01/05/5-years-of-freexian/
My Debian
Santiago Vila writes:
> Alternatively, we could try to improve the current status a little bit
> for squeeze.
> (A system admin with about 45000 users in his system asked me about
> the new /etc/profile and the apparently arbitrary limit of 2).
> The block 3-5 is reserved *by us*, s
Hmm, I see this is already reported as Bug#161912.
However, this report includes a patch :-)
Feel free to merge them anyway.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.
Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.8.4.0
Severity: wishlist
On Thu, 20 May 2010, Roger Leigh wrote:
> On 20/05/2010 20:43, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > I don't think it's practical to ever get rid of the legacy UID range
> > fragmentation in the 16-bit space. Better would be to plan a transition to
13 matches
Mail list logo
