Hi Ian,
On Sun, Sep 9, 2018 at 7:39 AM Ian Jackson
wrote:
> Maybe adding a link or xref to policy 5.6.12.1 would be helpful.
Good point, thanks! I updated the MR to include the reference to the policy.
Joseph
Sean Whitton writes ("Bug#908291: developers-reference, section 5.11.4: Add a
note on versioning scheme when reverting an NMU"):
> On Fri 07 Sep 2018 at 10:48PM -0700, Joseph Herlant wrote:
> > I took the liberty to provide a patch via a MR:
> >
Hello,
On Fri 07 Sep 2018 at 10:48PM -0700, Joseph Herlant wrote:
> The Developer's reference explains a lot about NMUs and corresponding version
> scheme but it does not explain the naming convention to use when you have to
> revert an NMU that brings a new upstream version.
> Lintian has a
Source: developers-reference
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Dear Maintainer,
The Developer's reference explains a lot about NMUs and corresponding version
scheme but it does not explain the naming convention to use when you have to
revert an NMU that brings a new upstream version.
Lintian has a
4 matches
Mail list logo
