Re: Bug#92981: uw-imapd-ssl: can't use maildir format with uw-imap (fwd)

2001-04-15 Thread Josip Rodin
On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 01:58:31PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: Jaldhar 1. What is the rationale for the policy mail spools must be Jaldhar 0660 $USER:mail? For a 660 mailbox with gid==mail, a sgid mail delivery agent is required. A 600 perm mailbox requires a suid 0

Re: Bug#92981: uw-imapd-ssl: can't use maildir format with uw-imap (fwd)

2001-04-15 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Sun, Apr 15, 2001 at 03:48:55PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 01:58:31PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: Jaldhar 1. What is the rationale for the policy mail spools must be Jaldhar 0660 $USER:mail? For a 660 mailbox with gid==mail, a sgid mail delivery

Re: Bug#92981: uw-imapd-ssl: can't use maildir format with uw-imap (fwd)

2001-04-15 Thread Josip Rodin
On Sun, Apr 15, 2001 at 11:23:52PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote: Jaldhar 1. What is the rationale for the policy mail spools must be Jaldhar 0660 $USER:mail? For a 660 mailbox with gid==mail, a sgid mail delivery agent is required. A 600 perm mailbox requires a suid 0

Re: Bug#92981: uw-imapd-ssl: can't use maildir format with uw-imap (fwd)

2001-04-15 Thread Seth Arnold
[I've gotten to the point of not knowing who said what.. so all attributions are cut.] Or better, it requires that the delivery agent runs under uid of the user that owns the mailbox. But then the delivery agent has to start off running as root to fire off an MDA with the user id of

Re: Bug#92981: uw-imapd-ssl: can't use maildir format with uw-imap (fwd)

2001-04-14 Thread Manoj Srivastava
Jaldhar == Jaldhar H Vyas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Jaldhar 1. What is the rationale for the policy mail spools must be Jaldhar 0660 $USER:mail? For a 660 mailbox with gid==mail, a sgid mail delivery agent is required. A 600 perm mailbox requires a suid 0 delivery agent.

Re: Bug#92981: uw-imapd-ssl: can't use maildir format with uw-imap (fwd)

2001-04-10 Thread Jaldhar H. Vyas
[I'm forwarding this message from debian-devel as it didn't get answered there. Any input is most welcome! Please Cc me on replies as I'm not subscribd to debian-policy.] Is it a problem that the spool files are not rw for the group? Postfix delivers that way. Then postfix is