On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 01:58:31PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Jaldhar 1. What is the rationale for the policy mail spools must be
Jaldhar 0660 $USER:mail?
For a 660 mailbox with gid==mail, a sgid mail delivery agent
is required. A 600 perm mailbox requires a suid 0
On Sun, Apr 15, 2001 at 03:48:55PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 01:58:31PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Jaldhar 1. What is the rationale for the policy mail spools must be
Jaldhar 0660 $USER:mail?
For a 660 mailbox with gid==mail, a sgid mail delivery
On Sun, Apr 15, 2001 at 11:23:52PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
Jaldhar 1. What is the rationale for the policy mail spools must be
Jaldhar 0660 $USER:mail?
For a 660 mailbox with gid==mail, a sgid mail delivery agent
is required. A 600 perm mailbox requires a suid 0
[I've gotten to the point of not knowing who said what.. so all
attributions are cut.]
Or better, it requires that the delivery agent runs under uid of the user
that owns the mailbox.
But then the delivery agent has to start off running as root to fire
off an MDA with the user id of
Jaldhar == Jaldhar H Vyas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jaldhar 1. What is the rationale for the policy mail spools must be
Jaldhar 0660 $USER:mail?
For a 660 mailbox with gid==mail, a sgid mail delivery agent
is required. A 600 perm mailbox requires a suid 0 delivery agent.
[I'm forwarding this message from debian-devel as it didn't get answered
there. Any input is most welcome! Please Cc me on replies as I'm not
subscribd to debian-policy.]
Is it a problem that the spool files are not rw for the group? Postfix
delivers that way.
Then postfix is
6 matches
Mail list logo