On Sun, Sep 13, 1998 at 09:30:41PM -0400, Justin Maurer wrote:
i would definitley prefer one or the other. i think non-compressed is the
way to go. consider this: slowe machines would crumble on unzipping larger
files, but newer machines would have plenty of space. i really think we
should
Hi,
Hamish == Hamish Moffatt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hamish Consistency is to compress them -- we compress all other
Hamish documentation in /usr/doc except the copyright files.
Not quite ;-). We definitely compress changelog.html. However,
we still do not compress multi-file HTML
On Mon, Sep 14, 1998 at 10:00:36PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
On Mon, 14 Sep 1998, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
So should we change i386-hurd to i386-gnu on the ftp archive? This would
also express the explicit wish of Gordon, IIRC.
I don't think this is strictly necessary, it would add
On Tue, 15 Sep 1998, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
On Mon, Sep 14, 1998 at 10:00:36PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
On Mon, 14 Sep 1998, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
So should we change i386-hurd to i386-gnu on the ftp archive? This would
also express the explicit wish of Gordon, IIRC.
I
Compressed html changelogs:
If I understand correctly, Manoj's argument is basically that
except for extreme circumstances, the lack of convenience in dealing
with compressed html changelogs outweighs the size benefits. On that
matter I don't really have a firm conviction one way or
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Hi,
Guy == Guy Maor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Guy Zed Pobre [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Compressed html changelogs:
Guy dwww deals transparently with compressed html files. Why can't
Guy html changelogs be compressed then?
Actually, so can lynx,
Zed Pobre wrote:
Files section:
I left the files section as it was in the original proposal under
the idea that a minimal set of changes was more likely to find
agreement. Originally, the thought was to separate the issue of
logfiles being a subsection of files rather than
Joseph Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Because dwww requires essentially apache, though with effort it can work
with other things.
It works with boa out of the box. boa is very light-weight.
Guy
On Mon, 14 Sep 1998, Joseph Carter wrote:
On Sun, Sep 13, 1998 at 07:57:48PM -0700, Guy Maor wrote:
Compressed html changelogs:
dwww deals transparently with compressed html files. Why can't
html changelogs be compressed then?
Because dwww requires essentially apache, though with
On Mon, 14 Sep 1998, Zed Pobre wrote:
In the mean time, then, if I understand correctly, the only arch
string that will allow proper compilation is i386-gnu?
Yes, because the gnumach kernel does only work under intel currently.
--
136b152ac3c4c1d999f0afddbbb9c284 (a truly random sig)
On Mon, Sep 14, 1998 at 05:24:25PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
On Mon, 14 Sep 1998, Zed Pobre wrote:
In the mean time, then, if I understand correctly, the only arch
string that will allow proper compilation is i386-gnu?
Yes, because the gnumach kernel does only work under intel
On Mon, 14 Sep 1998, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
On Mon, Sep 14, 1998 at 05:24:25PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
On Mon, 14 Sep 1998, Zed Pobre wrote:
In the mean time, then, if I understand correctly, the only arch
string that will allow proper compilation is i386-gnu?
Yes,
12 matches
Mail list logo
