Jules Bean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any package which consisted of standalone licenses would go in verbatim.
Note that at least some licenses should be part of the base system.
Any non-free standards go in verbatim.
Only if they allow unlimited distribution. If distribution is somehow
Hi,
Marcus == Marcus Brinkmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Marcus Jules, did I understand you correctly that you mean with
Marcus standalone licenses licenses that don't apply to any work
Marcus specifically (for example a package with example licenses for
Marcus you to pick from, or a
On 17 Aug 1998, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
The GPL, LGPL, BSD, and Artistic licenses do not apply to any
software specifically, and can be considered stand alone. (If I am
wrong, please point out wording in the license that specifies which
package or specific software the license
Hi,
Santiago == Santiago Vila [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Santiago On 17 Aug 1998, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
The GPL, LGPL, BSD, and Artistic licenses do not apply to any
software specifically, and can be considered stand alone. (If I am
wrong, please point out wording in the license that
Hello,
On Mon, Aug 17, 1998 at 10:51:34AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Hi,
Marcus == Marcus Brinkmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The GPL, LGPL, BSD, and Artistic licenses do not apply to any
software specifically, and can be considered stand alone. (If I am
wrong, please point
Marcus writes:
The license applies to the software it copyrights.
The license grant (an abstraction) applies to the software to which it
grants rights. The license document represents this abstraction.
If I apply the GPL to my work, this work is copyrighted under the terms
of the GPL. If any
6 matches
Mail list logo
