Miquel == Miquel van Smoorenburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Miquel It sounds more like you want a rc.local style directory,
Miquel not rc.boot.
Miquel But what is so difficult about update-rc.d? It's only one
Miquel line in the postinst .. (and one in prerm)
It's not
Miquel == Miquel van Smoorenburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Miquel Well, what's wrong is that there is no certain order of
Miquel execution defined for the scripts in /etc/rc.boot. Then we
Miquel got things like /etc/rc.boot/0serial and such, so why not
Miquel use a system that
According to Ben Gertzfield:
I think both /etc/rcS.d/ and /etc/rc.boot/ have their place, and
I know personally that /etc/rc.boot/ is far more convenient for
non-packages that need to start up once on bootup and don't
want (or care) to know about update-rc.d.
Thoughts?
It sounds more like
Miquel == Miquel van Smoorenburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Miquel It sounds more like you want a rc.local style directory,
Miquel not rc.boot.
Miquel But what is so difficult about update-rc.d? It's only one
Miquel line in the postinst .. (and one in prerm)
It's not difficult
I'm going through my old bug reports, and I remembered people
telling me /etc/rc.boot/ is obsolete. But I just went to look at
the new policy (I assume 3.0.0.0 is the latest) and it has the same
old stuff about /etc/rc.boot/ :
(snip)
3.3.4 Boot-time initialization
There is another directory,
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Ben Gertzfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm going through my old bug reports, and I remembered people
telling me /etc/rc.boot/ is obsolete. But I just went to look at
the new policy (I assume 3.0.0.0 is the latest) and it has the same
old stuff about /etc/rc.boot/ :
6 matches
Mail list logo