Re: [PROPOSAL] Directories for local initialization scripts

Still regarding my proposal for the creation of a directory to place local init scritps, I'd like to propose the creation of a mechanism to handle user init scripts. Some users actually need to have persistent processes between reboots, and using similar functionalities for the system init

Re: [PROPOSAL] Directories for local initialization scripts

Julio wrote: init scritps, I'd like to propose the creation of a mechanism to handle user init scripts. Some users actually need to have persistent processes between reboots, and using similar functionalities for the system init mechanisms could be interesting. 0 * * * *

Re: [PROPOSAL] Directories for local initialization scripts

On Fri, Aug 20, 1999 at 09:22:38PM -0700, Joey Hess wrote: Julio wrote: init scritps, I'd like to propose the creation of a mechanism to handle user init scripts. Some users actually need to have persistent processes between reboots, and using similar functionalities for the system init

Re: shlibs file changes proposal

On Wed, Aug 18, 1999 at 07:53:11PM -0700, Joseph Carter wrote: Because it's the right thing to do? Because even some free programs use shlib plugins without sonames and it'd be better to maintain compatibility than to break it simply because we would prefer to have sonames? Because the

Seconded.

Just to clarify for Joey, I seconded this proposal in my last message. -- ..Aaron Van Couwenberghe... [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Berlin: http://www.berlin-consortium.org Debian GNU/Linux: http://www.debian.org There are three kinds of people in

Re: weekly policy summary

On Fri, 20 Aug 1999, Joey Hess wrote: Amendments FHS-compliant location of compiled examples (#42849) * Under discussion. * Proposed by Joey Hess; seconded by Julian Gilbey and Chris Waters. * This is a proposal for