Bug#51116: Suggestion: Packages should carry a manpage

1999-11-24 Thread Wichert Akkerman
Previously Ben Collins wrote: How about someone write a script that pulls all of the packages and if there isn't a man page matching the package name, create one using the package's description as the content. Call it update-packageman or something. shellutils contains a funky script that

Re: imp blows away hand-edited changes...

1999-11-24 Thread Craig Sanders
On Tue, Nov 23, 1999 at 04:34:59AM -0700, Ivan E. Moore II wrote: The package does follow policy in this manner. no it doesn't. in fact, imp is breaking policy because /etc/imp/defaults.php3 is not in the package and therefore does not belong to imp. ok...I never looked at it this

Re: Bug#50832: AMENDMENT] Clarify meaning of Essential: yes

1999-11-24 Thread Chris Waters
Anthony Towns aj@azure.humbug.org.au writes: Wichert, Chris, did this or my previous mail answer your objections, or...? Well, you did a good job of explaining, and I have a better idea of what you're *trying* to do now, but I'm still not sure this is the right way. You yourself admitted that

Re: Bug#50832: AMENDMENT] Clarify meaning of Essential: yes

1999-11-24 Thread Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
On Tue, Nov 23, 1999 at 02:54:56PM +, Julian Gilbey wrote: On Tue, Nov 23, 1999 at 11:02:24PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: close 50832 reopen 50832 Huh?! Amendment [...] DD/MM/YYY] Actually it might be better to close the proposal and reopen so

Bug#51116: Suggestion: Packages should carry a manpage

1999-11-24 Thread Chris Waters
Goswin Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Policy says that any binary must come with a manpage. I would like to have the same for packages. I think I disagree. What section would be appropriate? I think people are becoming too ready to propose grand, sweeping changes to policy in order to

Re: Bug#50832: AMENDMENT] Clarify meaning of Essential: yes

1999-11-24 Thread Anthony Towns
On Tue, Nov 23, 1999 at 06:00:32AM -0800, Chris Waters wrote: Anthony Towns aj@azure.humbug.org.au writes: Wichert, Chris, did this or my previous mail answer your objections, or...? You yourself admitted that this is more of an explanatory thing than actual policy (after all, the bug in

Bug#51116: Suggestion: Packages should carry a manpage

1999-11-24 Thread Roland Rosenfeld
Goswin Brederlow schrieb am Dienstag, den 23. November 1999: Policy says that any binary must come with a manpage. I would like to have the same for packages. I'm not sure, whether such a general rule is acceptable. Think for example about the long list of libstdc++* packages: Should we

policy summary

1999-11-24 Thread Joey Hess
I haven't posted these for a while since debian-policy has been quiet lately. This version has had all proposals that were added to the recent update of policy removed. Note: for details of the policy process, see http://www.debian.org/~srivasta/policy/ch3.html. Also, this summary is available on