Stephen Zander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > "Branden" == Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Branden> My mind can be changed. :)
> What?? When did that start happening? :)
It's always been _possible_. It just usually requires so much effort
that it's beyond the capabiliti
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>"Juergen" == Juergen A Erhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Juergen> I'd say (and I took it that way when I proposed 44922), that
> Juergen> anyone can make a (formal) proposal. *If* the proposer is
> Juergen> not a maintainer, it needs one seco
> "Anthony" == Anthony Towns writes:
Anthony> This argument could also be used to claim that stow
Anthony> should have a --no-tree-fold option. Replace `Debian
Anthony> packages' with `local packages' doing mkdir, and you've
Anthony> got the same problem.
When installing loca
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 53755 [ACCEPTED 02/01/2000] policy for usage of "xserver" alternative
Bug#53755: [PROPOSED] policy for usage of "xserver" alternative
Changed Bug title.
> retitle 53756 [ACCEPTED 02/01/2000] additions to virtual package list
Bug#53756: [PROPOSE
>>"Steve" == Steve Robbins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Steve> Essentially, I suggest that the language be changed from the
Steve> conditional to the present tense, and all the `policy
Steve> rationale' be dropped. I attach my quick attempt to do so.
I disagree about dropping the ratio
Hi,
I'll look over this document, and see what changes should be
made. I think that I'll probably retain some of the Introduction and
adminstrivia section in the document, and move things from future to
past tense, as appropriate.
manoj
--
I just heard the SEVENTIES were over
6 matches
Mail list logo
