Installation (apart from configuration) should become absolutly
non-interactive. Stopping the unpacking of setting up of packages just
because of one package needing the users interaction is anyoing.
At the moment Policy encourages the package to display important
information and request the user
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The second thing is that such information should be collected during
install and be displayed in one chunk afterwards (in a series of
debconf requesters?).
Actually, debconf allows such things to be shown _before_ install.
The third thing isn't relevant to the
Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The second thing is that such information should be collected during
install and be displayed in one chunk afterwards (in a series of
debconf requesters?).
Actually, debconf allows such things to be shown _before_ install.
Hi,
I have a number of serious technical objections to this.
goswin == goswin brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
goswin Installation (apart from configuration) should become
goswin absolutly non-interactive. Stopping the unpacking of setting
goswin up of packages just because of one
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But you give me an idea that is probably hard to do but would be
great. What if debconf had a postpone button.
It does. See the mail this to me button on the slang frontend.
--
see shy jo
Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But you give me an idea that is probably hard to do but would be
great. What if debconf had a postpone button.
It does. See the mail this to me button on the slang frontend.
Loks like I need to install a fresh system.
The
6 matches
Mail list logo
