On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 11:43:41PM -0600, Taral wrote:
I've found at least one package that has parallel build options in the
debian/rules file. This is most annoying, to say the least, and possibly
wasteful of buildd resources. Would anyone consider making a policy
statement on this
OK, after Wichert's comments, here is a new version of the proposed
amendment to policy. Note that there is no mention of debian/rules
-q target giving exit status of 2 if the target does not exist;
this should really be handled as part of the question of whether
debian/rules are makefiles is
On Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 07:32:34AM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote:
Julian Gilbey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's probably correct; they function perfectly if everything works,
but if the postinst ends up being called with an abort-* argument, I'm
not sure that it would. Any experts out there?
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 11:43:41PM -0600, Taral wrote:
I've found at least one package that has parallel build options in the
debian/rules file. This is most annoying, to say the least, and possibly
wasteful of buildd resources. Would anyone consider making a policy
statement on this
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 14:14:37 +0200, Gerd Knorr wrote:
lesstif focuses on reimplementing the version 1.2 API (unless it has
changed recently and I did'nt notice).
The operative word being focuses... Quoting
http://www.lesstif.org/FAQ.html#QU1.14 :
:* Will LessTif be Motif2.1 Compliant?
:
5 matches
Mail list logo
