Chris Waters wrote:
On Sat, Aug 18, 2001 at 11:06:36PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
Well, if I downgrade my must not's to should not's, would you second
the proposal?
I'm not sure, I have a terrific mail backlog and skimmed your proposal.
Chris makes some good points too, in the parts of
Hi,
I am not sure this is a good timing for this to be a policy
proposal. Please read on to see why I think so.
Cesar == Cesar Eduardo Barros [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Cesar Debian uses the traditional mailbox style by default.
[ Snip reasons for why this is not a good idea
Branden == Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Branden On Sat, Aug 18, 2001 at 11:05:59PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
I guess it says something for policy not needing to be used as a stick;
a mere 'should' has clearly sufficed.
Branden Well, if I downgrade my must not's to should not's,
On Sun, Aug 19, 2001 at 11:03:11PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Have you asked yourself whether this really needs a policy
dictum? (It does not, in my opinion. Recommended practice suggestions
ought to go into the developers reference; not policy).
Is the Developers' Reference
Branden == Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Branden Is the Developers' Reference presently maintained?
I would so assume. The maintainer, Adam Di Carlo, is fairly
active, and I would think that any proposed additions would be
incorporated. He has been releasing the reference
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.5.6.0
Severity: normal
Section 9.6 of the policy says about debian/shlibs.local:
This file is intended only as a _temporary_ fix if your binaries or
libraries depend on a library whose package does not
6 matches
Mail list logo
