[ No need to CC me, btw, despite the evil the BTS does to Reply-To ]
On Sat, 2002-08-17 at 23:14, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
You might want to add a warning that this needs to be tested. Some
packages, like glibc or the Hurd, can not be built without optimization
(for example because of inline
This would lose a feature that I find valuable: usually, recompiling
a package with the debug option will generate a binary whose symbols
are compatible with the normal packaged binary. I have used this
several times to chase down hard-to-find library compatibility bugs,
or to interpret
On Sun, 18 Aug 2002, Richard Braakman wrote:
This would lose a feature that I find valuable: usually, recompiling
a package with the debug option will generate a binary whose symbols
are compatible with the normal packaged binary. I have used this
several times to chase down hard-to-find
Please see also my comments in #113525.
Ian.
On Sun, 2002-08-18 at 15:45, Ian Jackson wrote:
Please see also my comments in #113525.
I personally have no strong opinion on this, really. Whoever wrote the
Rationale: part of this section obviously disagrees with you, though.
Maybe machines are fast enough today in general that it isn't as
On Sun, 2002-08-18 at 05:46, Richard Braakman wrote:
For that matter, there are also Heisenbugs to consider: some bugs only
appear in the optimized version, not the un-optimized. Compiling the
debugging version with different optimization flags would make tracking
down these bugs needlessly
On Sun, Aug 18, 2002 at 06:18:45PM -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
On Sun, 2002-08-18 at 15:45, Ian Jackson wrote:
Please see also my comments in #113525.
I personally have no strong opinion on this, really. Whoever wrote the
Rationale: part of this section obviously disagrees with you,
On Sun, Aug 18, 2002 at 11:52:54PM +0100, James Troup wrote:
Yes, but it's complete and utter crap; it was then and still is now.
Ben ran a buildd on vore which is one of the faster buildds, but I've
run both vore and some of our slower (arm, m68k) buildds and I can
guarantee you that the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 113525 wishlist
Bug#113525: DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=debug example in policy is unhelpful
Severity set to `wishlist'.
merge 157131 113525
Bug#113525: DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=debug example in policy is unhelpful
Bug#157131: [PROPOSAL] Suggest to minimize
severity 113525 wishlist
merge 157131 113525
retitle 157131 [PROPOSAL] Rework DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS section
thanks
On Sun, 2002-08-18 at 18:52, James Troup wrote:
I can
guarantee you that the additional time incurred by using '-g' is so
insignificant it's insulting to have to even discuss it.
I
10 matches
Mail list logo
