Bug#208010: [PROPOSAL] init script LSB 1.3 compliance

2003-09-15 Thread Bill Allombert
On Sat, Sep 13, 2003 at 08:35:08AM +0200, Martin Godisch wrote: All status messages mandated by policy should go to standard output. We can hope people have sufficient sense to use stderr for error messages. Yes, I think so. But now you suggest to add mandated by policy only, what's

Bug#209855: [PROPOSAL] Move documentation of behavior of ancient dpkg in 6.6 to a footnote

2003-09-15 Thread Andreas Metzler
severity 209855 normal retitle 209855 [AMENDMENT 15/09/2003] Move documentation of behavior of ancient dpkg in 6.6 to a footnote thank This proposal has received two seconds: Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] In accordance

Best practice for component packages descriptions.

2003-09-15 Thread Bill Allombert
Hello Debian folk, In the interest of improving description and reducing flamage, I would like to create a ``best practice'' for description of packages of extension of larger software (think plug-in, library, add-on, module, etc...). The question is how we refer to the larger software in the

Processed: Re: Bug#209855: [PROPOSAL] Move documentation of behavior of ancient dpkg in 6.6 to a footnote

2003-09-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 209855 normal Bug#209855: [PROPOSAL] Move documentation of behavior of ancient dpkg in 6.6 to a footnote Severity set to `normal'. retitle 209855 [AMENDMENT 15/09/2003] Move documentation of behavior of ancient dpkg in 6.6 to a footnote

Re: build-depends-indep and arch: all source packages

2003-09-15 Thread Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
On 20030903T212419+0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: When build-depends were first created, people started adding build-depends for arch-independent packages in multi-binary source packages, resulting in waste of resources by autobuilders installing packages they won't need to build the package.

CVS srivasta: [AMENDMENT 15/09/2003] Move documentation of behavior of ancient dpkg in 6.6 to a footnote. closes: Bug#209855

2003-09-15 Thread Debian Policy CVS
CVSROOT:/cvs/debian-policy Module name:debian-policy Changes by: srivastaMon Sep 15 11:19:34 MDT 2003 Modified files: . : policy.sgml debian : changelog Log message: [AMENDMENT 15/09/2003] Move documentation of behavior of ancient

Bug#209855: #209855: [AMENDMENT 15/09/2003] Move documentation of behavior of ancient dpkg in 6.6 to a footnote

2003-09-15 Thread Manoj Srivastava
tags 209855 + pending thanks Hi, This amendment has been incorporated into the CVS repository, and shall be included in the next upload of the policy document. manoj -- You're a good example of why some animals eat their young. Jim Samuels to a heckler Ah, yes. I remember my

Processed: #209855: [AMENDMENT 15/09/2003] Move documentation of behavior of ancient dpkg in 6.6 to a footnote

2003-09-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 209855 + pending Bug#209855: [AMENDMENT 15/09/2003] Move documentation of behavior of ancient dpkg in 6.6 to a footnote There were no tags set. Tags added: pending thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance.