Bug#424212: Possible patch

2007-06-29 Thread Gerard Lledó
Hi, The problem is that debian/rules is overwriting the main Makefile in the first build with the Makefile that is contained in fhs-2.3-source.tar.gz. Probably, this file was supossed to uncompress in a directory, but it's not doing that. Of course, the second time that you try to build, the

Processed: [PROPOSAL] Disambiguate of Section 12.5, Deprecate GPL/LGPL symlinks

2007-06-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: retitle 431109 [PROPOSAL] Disambiguate of Section 12.5, Deprecate GPL/LGPL symlinks Bug#431109: please add GPL-3 and LGPL-3 Changed Bug title to `[PROPOSAL] Disambiguate of Section 12.5, Deprecate GPL/LGPL symlinks' from `please add GPL-3 and

Bug#431109: [PROPOSAL] Disambiguate of Section 12.5, Deprecate GPL/LGPL symlinks

2007-06-29 Thread Robert Millan
retitle 431109 [PROPOSAL] Disambiguate of Section 12.5, Deprecate GPL/LGPL symlinks thanks On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 10:04:02PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote: Following /usr/share/doc/base-files/FAQ, I'm reassigning this to debian-policy. Please read my email to debian-legal ad debian-policy

Bug#431109: [PROPOSAL] Disambiguate of Section 12.5, Deprecate GPL/LGPL symlinks

2007-06-29 Thread Santiago Vila
This proposal does essentialy two things: - Disambiguate GPL/LGPL versioning requirement by extending it to any DFSG compatible version the FSF may publish. - Deprecate use of symlinks, since they're a source of problems (as exposed by GPLv3, see

Bug#431109: [PROPOSAL] Disambiguate of Section 12.5, Deprecate GPL/LGPL symlinks

2007-06-29 Thread Santiago Vila
+ file. Packages should not refer to GPL and LGPL symlinks in + that directory since different, incompatible versions of these + licenses have been published by the Free Software Foundation, + hence using the symlinks could lead to ambiguity. I disagree with this.

Bug#431109: [PROPOSAL] Disambiguate of Section 12.5, Deprecate GPL/LGPL symlinks

2007-06-29 Thread Robert Millan
On Sat, Jun 30, 2007 at 12:17:00AM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote: + file. Packages should not refer to GPL and LGPL symlinks in + that directory since different, incompatible versions of these + licenses have been published by the Free Software Foundation, + hence

Bug#431109: [PROPOSAL] Disambiguate of Section 12.5, Deprecate GPL/LGPL symlinks

2007-06-29 Thread Santiago Vila
On Sat, 30 Jun 2007, Robert Millan wrote: On Sat, Jun 30, 2007 at 12:17:00AM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote: + file. Packages should not refer to GPL and LGPL symlinks in + that directory since different, incompatible versions of these + licenses have been published by

Bug#99324: Hi

2007-06-29 Thread gradwell dot com
Hello, Thank you for your mail (Hi) to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To confirm that your mail is legitimate, simply click on this URL: https://www.gradwell.com/u/?c=124e411c38944cd496253d8b1e and your mail will be delivered within a few minutes. Once you have confirmed this mail then you will never have