Processed: user debian-pol...@packages.debian.org, limit package to debian-policy, usertagging 552757 ...

2009-11-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: user debian-pol...@packages.debian.org Setting user to debian-pol...@packages.debian.org (was r...@debian.org). limit package debian-policy Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'debian-policy' Limit currently set to

Re: Bug#552690: mknod-in-maintainer-script postinst:39

2009-11-12 Thread Russ Allbery
Manoj Srivastava sriva...@debian.org writes: On Thu, Oct 29 2009, Simon Horman wrote: Could you suggest a policy-compliant method of creating fifos for the package? At the time that I added mknod to the maintainer script the consensus that this was the best option available. You may

Re: Bug#552690: mknod-in-maintainer-script postinst:39

2009-11-12 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Thu, Nov 12 2009, Russ Allbery wrote: Manoj Srivastava sriva...@debian.org writes: On Thu, Oct 29 2009, Simon Horman wrote: Could you suggest a policy-compliant method of creating fifos for the package? At the time that I added mknod to the maintainer script the consensus that this was

Bug#555977: debian-policy: Constraints on binary package control files

2009-11-12 Thread Russ Allbery
Package: debian-policy Version: 3.8.3.0 Severity: wishlist Lintian has several checks for the control files included in a binary package, but so far as I can tell, there is no general discussion in Policy right now about these files or any restrictions on them. This seems like something that

Bug#555979: debian-policy: Symlinks pointing beyond the root of the file system

2009-11-12 Thread Russ Allbery
Package: debian-policy Version: 3.8.3.0 Severity: wishlist Lintian has a tag: Tag: symlink-has-too-many-up-segments Severity: serious Certainty: certain Ref: policy 10.5 Info: The symlink references a directory beyond the root directory /. for symlinks that contain so many ../ segments that

Re: Bug#552690: mknod-in-maintainer-script postinst:39

2009-11-12 Thread Andrew McMillan
Seconded. On Thu, 2009-11-12 at 13:29 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: Manoj Srivastava sriva...@debian.org writes: On Thu, Oct 29 2009, Simon Horman wrote: Could you suggest a policy-compliant method of creating fifos for the package? At the time that I added mknod to the maintainer script

Bug#555980: debian-policy: No policy on statically linked binaries

2009-11-12 Thread Russ Allbery
Package: debian-policy Version: 3.8.3.0 Severity: wishlist Unless I'm missing something, and I did a text search through Policy, Policy is currently silent on the topic of statically linked binaries other than a brief mention in a footnote on convenience copies of code. I believe we should say

Bug#555981: debian-policy: No clear discussion of arch-independent vs. arch-dependent packages

2009-11-12 Thread Russ Allbery
Package: debian-policy Version: 3.8.3.0 Severity: wishlist I again may be missing something, but I don't believe there's anywhere in Policy that says the obvious things about architecture-independent packages versus architecture-dependent packages. I'm thinking of the basic definitional things

Re: Bug#552690: mknod-in-maintainer-script postinst:39

2009-11-12 Thread Russ Allbery
Andrew McMillan and...@morphoss.com writes: Seconded. Thanks to you and Manoj. Pushed. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Bug#555981: debian-policy: No clear discussion of arch-independent vs. arch-dependent packages

2009-11-12 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Russ Allbery r...@debian.org (12/11/2009): Architecture-independent packages are packages that will function on any architecture supported by Debian. While I can think of plenty of Perl packages where it's about “functioning”, there are also a lot of data packages around, so I'm not sure

Bug#555982: debian-policy: RPATH in binaries and shared libraries

2009-11-12 Thread Russ Allbery
Package: debian-policy Version: 3.8.3.0 Severity: wishlist Lintian has the following tag: Tag: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath Severity: serious Certainty: possible Ref: http://wiki.debian.org/RpathIssue Info: The binary or shared library sets RPATH. This overrides the normal library search

Difficulty rebuilding text files with org-mode

2009-11-12 Thread Russ Allbery
Manoj, when I tried to rebuild upgrading-checklist, I got the following error: % /usr/bin/emacs23 --batch -Q -l ./README-css.el -l org --visit upgrading-checklist.org --funcall org-export-as-ascii Loading vc-git... Autoloading failed to define function org-export-as-ascii Running: %

Re: Bug#555977: debian-policy: Constraints on binary package control files

2009-11-12 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 04:17:33PM -0800, Russ Allbery a écrit : In addition, Lintian also warns if a control file is empty or if it's not one of the known set of control files, which at present is: clilibs config control conffiles md5sums postinst preinst postrm prerm shlibs

Processed: Re: Bug#469154: chapter 4.10: PTS summary description needs update

2009-11-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 469154 + patch Bug #469154 [developers-reference] chapter 4.10: PTS summary description needs update Added tag(s) patch. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Processed: Re: Bug#540231: Override changes

2009-11-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 540231 + patch Bug #540231 [developers-reference] [jo...@ganneff.de: Override changes] Added tag(s) patch. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator,

Bug#554054: , #554077: s/ftp-master.debian.org/ftp.upload.debian.org/ etc.

2009-11-12 Thread Simon McVittie
tags 554054 + patch tags 554077 + patch thanks Here are some proposed patches to clarify the status of upload queues, both also available in http://git.debian.org/?p=users/smcv/developers-reference.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/misc. The second depends on the first. Regards, S From: Simon

Bug#555977: debian-policy: Constraints on binary package control files

2009-11-12 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 04:17:33PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: Lintian has several checks for the control files included in a binary package, but so far as I can tell, there is no general discussion in Policy right now about these files or any restrictions on them. This seems like something

Bug#555977: debian-policy: Constraints on binary package control files

2009-11-12 Thread Russ Allbery
Charles Plessy ple...@debian.org writes: Le Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 04:17:33PM -0800, Russ Allbery a écrit : In addition, Lintian also warns if a control file is empty or if it's not one of the known set of control files, which at present is: clilibs config control conffiles md5sums

Bug#469154: chapter 4.10: PTS summary description needs update

2009-11-12 Thread Simon McVittie
tags 469154 + patch thanks On Tue, 11 Mar 2008 at 17:15:09 +0100, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: * Raphael Hertzog hert...@debian.org [2008-03-11 14:59:09 CET]: On Mon, 10 Mar 2008, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: summary Regular summary emails about the package's status. Currently, only

Bug#555685: typo transferred instead of transfered

2009-11-12 Thread Simon McVittie
tags 555685 + patch severity 555685 minor thanks While I'm doing trivial patches anyway... (For my own convenience I'm collecting patches into a git-svn branch; feel free to take these patches from that repository, or ignore it, as you see fit.) From: Simon McVittie s...@debian.org Date: Fri,

Bug#540231: Override changes

2009-11-12 Thread Simon McVittie
tags 540231 + patch thanks How about this for a patch? (For my own convenience I'm collecting patches into a git-svn branch; feel free to take these patches from that repository, or ignore it, as you see fit.) From: Simon McVittie s...@debian.org Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 01:46:48 + (+)

Bug#556015: debian-policy: Clarify requirements for copyright file

2009-11-12 Thread Russ Allbery
Package: debian-policy Version: 3.8.3.0 Severity: wishlist The requirements for the copyright file in binary and source packages has been the source of a lot of confusion and a lot of bug reports against Lintian. This is an attempt to state the requirements more specifically and more completely.

Bug#556015: debian-policy: Clarify requirements for copyright file

2009-11-12 Thread Russ Allbery
Russ Allbery r...@debian.org writes: The requirements for the copyright file in binary and source packages has been the source of a lot of confusion and a lot of bug reports against Lintian. This is an attempt to state the requirements more specifically and more completely. This also adds

Bug#556015: debian-policy: Clarify requirements for copyright file

2009-11-12 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 08:46:21PM -0800, Russ Allbery a écrit : + If a source package produces + binary packages with separate copyright files (if, for instance, + different binary packages produced from one source package have + substantially different distribution

Bug#556015: debian-policy: Clarify requirements for copyright file

2009-11-12 Thread Russ Allbery
Charles Plessy ple...@debian.org writes: Le Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 08:46:21PM -0800, Russ Allbery a écrit : + If a source package produces + binary packages with separate copyright files (if, for instance, + different binary packages produced from one source package have +

Re: Bug#556015: debian-policy: Clarify requirements for copyright file

2009-11-12 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 10:22:37PM -0800, Russ Allbery a écrit : Charles Plessy ple...@debian.org writes: Le Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 08:46:21PM -0800, Russ Allbery a écrit : +If a source package produces +binary packages with separate copyright files (if, for instance, +

Bug#556015: debian-policy: Clarify requirements for copyright file

2009-11-12 Thread Russ Allbery
Charles Plessy ple...@debian.org writes: Le Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 10:22:37PM -0800, Russ Allbery a écrit : It's an additional requirement over the current Policy statement, but according to previous statements by ftpmaster, it reflects what's currently being enforced during NEW processing.

Processed: user debian-pol...@packages.debian.org, limit package to debian-policy, usertagging 556015 ...

2009-11-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: user debian-pol...@packages.debian.org Setting user to debian-pol...@packages.debian.org (was r...@debian.org). limit package debian-policy Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'debian-policy' Limit currently set to

Bug#556015: debian-policy: Clarify requirements for copyright file

2009-11-12 Thread Russ Allbery
Here is an updated version of the patch that corrects or clarifies a few other places in Policy. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/ commit 10a36221dbdef0417c8fe5dd9153843fc160acd7 Author: Russ Allbery r...@debian.org Date: Thu Nov 12 20:39:41 2009