Bug#567845: debian-policy: broken formatting of upgrading-checklist.txt?

2010-02-11 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Hi Bill On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 12:50:03AM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 03:40:30PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 08:06:24PM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: Package: debian-policy Version: 3.8.4.0 Severity: minor Hi I

Bug#567845: debian-policy: broken formatting of upgrading-checklist.txt?

2010-02-11 Thread Bill Allombert
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 08:59:23AM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: Hi Bill Hello Salvatore, I checked this file before uploading the package but I thought this was the expected behavior of the formatter. In any case, I agree this is quite ugly and I have converted the org file to

Bug#567845: debian-policy: broken formatting of upgrading-checklist.txt?

2010-02-11 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Hi Bill On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 01:59:14PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 08:59:23AM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: Hi Bill Hello Salvatore, I checked this file before uploading the package but I thought this was the expected behavior of the formatter.

initial packages with multiarch paths

2010-02-11 Thread Simon McVittie
While trying to prepare a multiarch version of libdbus I received some conflicting advice about how much of the multiarch proposal is already allowed by Policy, so I've prepared a multiarch version of a rather simpler library (libgfshare) as a starting point. Does this look OK for upload to