Le Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 09:31:03AM -0700, Russ Allbery a écrit :
Charles Plessy ple...@debian.org writes:
will web servers find the CGI scripts automagically in
/usr/lib/cgi-bin/package?
That's the implication of this section. Web servers should be configured
to serve that location by
On 14/06/10 04:00, Russ Allbery wrote:
Objections or seconds?
diff --git a/policy.sgml b/policy.sgml
index df6ae89..5a76cf3 100644
--- a/policy.sgml
+++ b/policy.sgml
@@ -2672,7 +2672,7 @@ Package: libc6
p
The package maintainer's name and email address. The name
-
On Sun, 2010-06-13 at 19:00 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Helps if I send this to the correct bug.
Russ Allbery r...@debian.org writes:
* maintainer-name-missing and uploader-name-missing are both automatic
rejects in the ftp-master checks, which makes them automatically
severity:
On Sat, 12 Jun 2010, Russ Allbery wrote:
Russ Allbery r...@debian.org writes:
2. Apply the patch to Policy included below, which removes this license
from the list of licenses we tell people to reference from
/usr/share/common-licenses and explains why.
This patch has now been
On 14/06/10 12:55, Santiago Vila wrote:
I assume we will have to wait some time before we can remove the
license itself from base-files (i.e. until all packages stop
referencing the file).
Yes, that would be step 3 in Russ' plan.
Cheers,
Emilio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Santiago Vila sanv...@unex.es writes:
Noted, thanks.
I assume we will have to wait some time before we can remove the license
itself from base-files (i.e. until all packages stop referencing the
file).
Yeah, the next release of Lintian will have a tag for it, so we'll be able
to start
Russ Allbery r...@debian.org writes:
For background here, this bug is about permitting the splitting of the
architecture-independent headers for a library into a separate -headers
package rather than requiring (which the current Policy wording implies)
that they be in the usually
Russ Allbery r...@debian.org writes:
Here's a proposed patch that cleans up the wording of Maintainer,
Uploaders, and Changed-By to reflect current practice. There is another
outstanding bug in this area to document further restrictions on
Maintainer and Uploaders, but this is the easy part
I'm planning to upload Policy 3.8.5 next weekend (the delay being some
time to make the necessary updates to Lintian and hopefully release both
together). Please let me know if anyone sees any problems with that
plan.
If someone has a moment, I'd appreciate another review on #560411. I'd
like
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
user debian-pol...@packages.debian.org
Setting user to debian-pol...@packages.debian.org (was r...@debian.org).
limit package debian-policy
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'debian-policy'
Limit currently set to
10 matches
Mail list logo
