Bug#620566: dpkg: version number does not start with digit is in contrast to policy

2011-04-08 Thread Thorsten Glaser
On Mon, 4 Apr 2011, Carsten Hey wrote: upstream_version git1234 could be prefixed with epoch 0 and thus lead to the version number 0:git1234-debian_revision. Maybe this could be Nah. Just drop the leading 'git'. On Mon, 4 Apr 2011, Raphael Hertzog wrote: We have no upstream with such

Re: Patch for MultiarchCross

2011-04-08 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Steve Langasek vor...@debian.org writes: Hi there, On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 03:05:53AM +, Wookey wrote: The Multiarch specification only covers libraries and does not specifically deal with include files. To make multiarch useful for cross-building as well as co-installation of

Bug#620566: dpkg: version number does not start with digit is in contrast to policy

2011-04-08 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Raphael Hertzog hert...@debian.org writes: On Sun, 03 Apr 2011, Russ Allbery wrote: My inclination is to second this, but I want to make sure that we've answered your and Julien's objections first. And for complete reference, dpkg accepts those version in /var/lib/dpkg/status (so that dpkg

Bug#620566: dpkg: version number does not start with digit is in contrast to policy

2011-04-08 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Fri, 08 Apr 2011, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: It does not allow them in available though breaking many systems that have or in the past had a package with such a version available. At least 4 people on irc have run into that problem that I saw already. It does allow them in available. Those

Re: Patch for MultiarchCross

2011-04-08 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 07:44:27PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 03:05:53AM +, Wookey wrote: The Multiarch specification only covers libraries and does not specifically deal with include files. To make multiarch useful for cross-building as well as

Re: Patch for MultiarchCross

2011-04-08 Thread Bill Allombert
On Sat, Apr 02, 2011 at 01:14:28AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: Hi there, On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 03:05:53AM +, Wookey wrote: The Multiarch specification only covers libraries and does not specifically deal with include files. To make multiarch useful for cross-building as well

Gratis por TIEMPO LIMITADO

2011-04-08 Thread Curso Gratuito
4/8/2011 16:45:36 Todo propietario de un sitio web sabe que conseguir visitantes para el mismo es una tarea dura, y difícil, pero importantísima. El estar bien ubicado en los buscadores es una parte fundamental de la promoción de cualquier sitio web. Debido a que pensamos que el tema puede

Re: Patch for MultiarchCross

2011-04-08 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Steve Langasek vor...@debian.org writes: On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 07:44:27PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 03:05:53AM +, Wookey wrote: The Multiarch specification only covers libraries and does not specifically deal with include files. To make multiarch

Re: Patch for MultiarchCross

2011-04-08 Thread Simon McVittie
On Fri, 08 Apr 2011 at 21:51:03 +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: Requiring the user to pass -I to the compiler should be discouraged. I disagree: independently of multiarch, many libraries do this deliberately to allow for parallel-installation, and use pkg-config to give out appropriate CFLAGS.

Re: Patch for MultiarchCross

2011-04-08 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 09:51:03PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: I already made this comment, but I strongly think it should be normative. Specifically we should mandate that: 1) /usr/include/triplet be added to the default hearder search path of triplet-gcc. It seems strange to me that we

Re: Patch for MultiarchCross

2011-04-08 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 10:17:20PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: What could be allowed is using the new include paths with a Depends on the multiarch package even if the package itself is not multiarch. No. multiarch-support declares runtime support for ld.so. It has nothing to do

Re: Patch for MultiarchCross

2011-04-08 Thread Bill Allombert
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 02:01:33PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 09:51:03PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: I already made this comment, but I strongly think it should be normative. Specifically we should mandate that: 1) /usr/include/triplet be added to the default