On 26/12/12 23:39, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Charles Plessy wrote:
If experimentations are blocked because the current specification does not
allow unspecified types of paragraphs, how about considering to relax it ?
I honestly think that License-Exception stanzas already are a
fundamental
On 25/12/12 12:34, Ximin Luo wrote:
Example:
| Files: X
| Copyright: A
| License: BSD-3-Clause
| Copyright 2012 A
| terms etc
I don't think this is the problem: if the first two lines of
/usr/share/common-licenses/BSD (Copyright (c)... All rights reserved)
were ignored or removed, that
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 08:00:33AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
Unfortunately that would involve violating the spec. The current
specification requires that every paragraph be a header paragraph, a
Files paragraph, or a License paragraph. License-Exception paragraphs
are not allowed.
Charles Plessy wrote:
Sorry for the confusion between new field and new paragraph. Still, I think
that we are spending a lot of time discussing refinements that need to
demonstrate their usefulness by being adopted independantly by a broad number
of package maintainers.
Stepping back a
Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com writes:
Charles Plessy wrote:
Sorry for the confusion between new field and new paragraph. Still, I
think that we are spending a lot of time discussing refinements that
need to demonstrate their usefulness by being adopted independantly by
a broad number
5 matches
Mail list logo
