Bug#823584: [PATCH] Correct top-level directory name in repackaged tarballs

2016-05-07 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Fri, 06 May 2016, Tormod Volden wrote: > PS. I didn't think about it initially, but I guess "NACK" means > "thanks for your patch and your interest in the developer reference, > but I don't think this is the best solution." That's pretty much correct, yes. NACK in this context implies that

Re: Bug#823584: [PATCH] Correct top-level directory name in repackaged tarballs

2016-05-07 Thread Simon McVittie
On Sat, 07 May 2016 at 09:04:24 +1000, Ben Finney wrote: > * The Debian upstream source is identical to the original, so “.orig” > is appropriate in the directory name. > > * The Debian upstream source should unpack to ‘foo-1.2.3~xyz.orig/’. If we use upstream's tarball and do not repack