Processed: Re: Bug#40742: proftpd: needs to conflict only with old wu-ftpds

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 40742 debian-policy Bug#40742: proftpd: needs to conflict only with old wu-ftpds Bug reassigned from package `proftpd' to `debian-policy'. retitle 40742 proposal: a new virtual package for FTP servers Bug#40742: proftpd: needs to conflict

Bug#41269: marked as done (Bad version of debian-policy uploaded)

: Samuel Tardieu [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Bad version of debian-policy uploaded X-Mailer: reportbug 0.13 Date: Wed, 14 Jul 1999 14:18:47 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: debian-policy Version: 3.0.0.0 Severity

Processed: Old proposals and fixed bugs

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: retitle 39398 [PROPOSED] debian-policy has an unclear statement on dependancies and priorities Bug#39398: debian-policy has an unclear statement on dependancies and priorities Changed bug title. severity 39398 wishlist Bug#39398: [PROPOSED]

Processed: Bug#24067: Is it ok to close a bug without fixing it?

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 24067 normal Bug#24067: [REJECTED] Is it ok to close a bug without fixing it? Severity set to `normal'. retitle 24067 Is it ok to close a bug without fixing it? Bug#24067: [REJECTED] Is it ok to close a bug without fixing it? Changed bug

Processed: [AMENDMENT 17/7/99] /usr/share/doc vs. /usr/doc transition

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: retitle 40706 [AMENDMENT 17/7/99] /usr/share/doc vs. /usr/doc transition Bug#40706: /usr/share/doc vs. /usr/doc Changed bug title. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Ian Jackson (administrator, Debian bugs

Processed: Next step

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 38902 fixed Bug#38902: [PROPOSED] data section Severity set to `fixed'. retitle 38902 [ACCEPTED 07/16/99] Data section Bug#38902: [PROPOSED] data section Changed bug title. -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need

Processed: argh! That's TWICE!

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: retitle 37251 [REJECTED] Software depending on non-US Bug#37251: [AMENDMENT 1999/05/06] Software depending on non-US Changed bug title. retitle 37262 [REJECTED] Software depending on non-US Bug#37262: [AMENDMENT 1999/05/06] Software depending on

Processed: Re: weekly policy summary

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: retitle 32448 [ACCEPTED 1999/07/18] Policy should use /etc/rcS.d instead of /etc/rc.boot Bug#32448: [PROPOSED] Policy should suggest /etc/rcS.d instead of /etc/rc.boot Changed bug title. severity 32448 normal Bug#32448: [ACCEPTED 1999/07/18] Policy

Processed: Re: Processed: Bug#24067: Is it ok to close a bug without fixing it?

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 24067 gawk Bug#24067: Is it ok to close a bug without fixing it? Bug reassigned from package `debian-policy' to `gawk'. retitle 24067 changelog does not tell the truth Bug#24067: Is it ok to close a bug without fixing it? Changed bug title.

Processed: dpkg: update-alternatives madness

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 37254 debian-policy, dpkg Bug#37254: dpkg: update-alternatives madness Bug reassigned from package `dpkg' to `debian-policy, dpkg'. severity 37254 normal Bug#37254: dpkg: update-alternatives madness Severity set to `normal'. quit Stopping

Processed: Re: Bug#40706: Reasons for not moving at all

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: retitle 40706 [REJECTED 21/7/99] /usr/share/doc vs. /usr/doc transition Bug#40706: [AMENDMENT 17/7/99] /usr/share/doc vs. /usr/doc transition Changed bug title. severity 40706 fixed Bug#40706: [REJECTED 21/7/99] /usr/share/doc vs. /usr/doc transition

Processed: got two seconds

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: retitle 41232 [AMENDMENT 1999-07-23] Build-time dependencies on binary packages Bug#41232: debian-policy: [PROPOSAL] Build-time dependencies on binary packages Changed bug title. severity 41232 normal Bug#41232: [AMENDMENT 1999-07-23] Build-time

Processed: Fixed in NMU debian-policy 3.0.1.0

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 25533 fixed Bug#25533: [OLD PROPOSAL] Debian-policy should probably contain the FHS standard Severity set to `fixed'. severity 26159 fixed Bug#26159: [OLD PROPOSAL] Contact address for virtual package name list Severity set to `fixed'.

Bug#42432: marked as done (debian-policy: Proposal for CTV for Draft for Proof of Concept for Draft for Proposal for Proposal for CTV for a CTV to decide on a proposal for a CTV for the CTV on whether or not we shoud have a CTV on the /usr/doc to /usr/share/doc transition now, or later.)

Your message dated 04 Aug 1999 02:31:33 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Political commentary on the process is not a bug in policy. has caused the attached bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

Processed: Re: Bug#42477: Acknowledgement ([PROPOSED} delay the /usr/doc transition till after potato)

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: retitle 42477 [PROPOSED] delay the /usr/doc transition till after potato Bug#42477: [PROPOSED} delay the /usr/doc transition till after potato Changed bug title. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Ian Jackson

Processed: Re: Bug#42849: er

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: retitle 42849 [PROPOSED] FHS-compliant location of compiled examples Bug#42849: er Changed bug title. severity 42849 wishlist Bug#42849: [PROPOSED] FHS-compliant location of compiled examples Severity set to `wishlist'. close 42857 Bug#42857: er Bug

Processed: Re: *wav* executable are not setgid audio.

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 42907 debian-policy Bug#42907: *wav* executable are not setgid audio. Bug reassigned from package `wavtools' to `debian-policy'. retitle 42907 Policy should mention permissions of /dev/[dsp,audio,mixer] Bug#42907: *wav* executable are not

Processed:

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 42907 normal Bug#42907: Policy should mention permissions of /dev/[dsp,audio,mixer] Severity set to `normal'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Ian Jackson (administrator, Debian bugs database)

Processed: Bug#41232: debian-policy: [ACCEPTED] Build-time dependencies on binary packages

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: retitle 41232 [ACCEPTED] Build-time dependencies on binary packages Bug#41232: [AMENDMENT 1999-07-23] Build-time dependencies on binary packages Changed bug title. forwarded 41232 debian-policy@lists.debian.org Bug#41232: [ACCEPTED] Build-time

Processed: Fixed in NMU debian-policy 3.0.1.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 40180 fixed Bug#40180: packaging manual typo Severity set to `fixed'. quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Ian Jackson (administrator, Debian bugs database)

Processed: Maintainer unknown

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 43629 spam Bug#43629: Cuando este conforme con nuestro trabajo nos paga. Bug assigned to package `spam'. reassign 43669 perl-tk Bug#43669: Problems with BrowseEntry Bug assigned to package `perl-tk'. reassign 43724 debian-policy Bug#43724:

Processed: consensus on debug (-g) policy

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: retitle 43787 [AMENDED] changing policy on compiling with -g .. a better way Bug#43787: [AMENDMENT 8/30/1999] changing policy on compiling with -g .. a better way Changed bug title. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need

Processed: Setting the correct status as per the guidelines

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: forwarded 43787 debian-policy@lists.debian.org Bug#43787: [AMENDED] changing policy on compiling with -g .. a better way Noted your statement that bug has been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED] severity 43787 normal Bug#43787: [AMENDED] changing policy

Processed: Re: consensus on debug (-g) policy

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: retitle 43787 [AMENDMENT 05/09/1999] Compiling with debugging symbols Bug#43787: [ACCEPTED 05/09/1999] Compiling with debugging symbols Changed bug title. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Ian Jackson

Processed: Bug#41547: Mark as accepted

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 41547 normal Bug#41547: [PROPOSAL] Correct section 3.3 to take account of file-rc Severity set to `normal'. retitle 41547 [ACCEPTED 1/9/99] Correct section 3.3 to take account of file-rc Bug#41547: [PROPOSAL] Correct section 3.3 to take

Processed: Upping to amendment: MIME support sub-policy

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: close 46516 Bug#46516: [PROPOSAL] MIME support sub-policy Bug closed, ack sent to submitter - they'd better know why ! reopen 46516 Bug#46516: [PROPOSAL] MIME support sub-policy Bug reopened, originator not changed. retitle 46516 [AMENDMENT

Processed: Re: Bug#45318: [PROPOSAL] Amend contrib definition

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: retitle 45319 [DUPLICATE] Amend contrib definition Bug#45319: [PROPOSAL] Ammend contrib definition Changed Bug title. close 45319 Bug#45319: [DUPLICATE] Amend contrib definition Bug closed, ack sent to submitter - they'd better know why ! close

Processed: Bug#43651: mailbox locking

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: close 43651 Bug#43651: debian-policy: [PROPOSAL] mailbox locking Bug closed, ack sent to submitter - they'd better know why ! reopen 43651 Bug#43651: debian-policy: [PROPOSAL] mailbox locking Bug reopened, originator not changed. severity normal

Processed: going through some bug reports still...

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: close 31421 Bug#31421: dpkg: display problems after dselect suspended Bug closed, ack sent to submitter - they'd better know why ! merge 3410 2904 Bug#2904: install-info doesn't cope with nonexistent /usr/info/dir file Bug#3410: some

Processed: now on to dpkg-dev bugs...

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 16443 dpkg-iwj Bug#16443: dpkg-genchanges can't handle multi-architectures / and closes Bug reassigned from package `dpkg-dev' to `dpkg-iwj'. severity 17775 wishlist Bug#17775: Autocompilation of Packages Severity set to `wishlist'.

Processed: Close accepted policy amendments

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: close 21969 Bug#21969: [ACCEPTED 1998/05/01] Policy clarification about Standards-Version Bug closed, ack sent to submitter - they'd better know why ! close 28747 Bug#28747: [ACCEPTED 1999/04/05] Policy note that GPL moved to

Bug#41729: marked as done ([REJECTED] Modify dpkg-buildpackage to handle FHS move)

Your message dated Tue, 26 Oct 1999 01:12:11 +0100 (BST) with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#41729: [PROPOSAL] Modify dpkg-buildpackage to handle FHS move has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.

Processed: policy administrivia

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: retitle 46522 [PROPOSED] Simplified definition of Non-free Bug#46522: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: SSH never free] Changed Bug title. severity 46522 wishlist Bug#46522: [PROPOSED] Simplified definition of Non-free Severity set to `wishlist'. retitle 48247

Bug#26995: marked as done ([BUG] problem viewing fsstnd-1.2.dvi.gz)

Your message dated Tue, 26 Oct 1999 11:05:49 +0100 (BST) with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#26995: fsstnd-1.2.dvi.gz is wrong has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#40742: marked as done ([PROPOSED] a new virtual package for FTP servers)

Your message dated Tue, 26 Oct 1999 15:36:43 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#40742: Your policy proposal has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Processed: Reassign back to dpkg

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 37254 dpkg Bug#37254: dpkg: update-alternatives madness Bug reassigned from package `debian-policy, dpkg' to `dpkg'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs

Bug#29522: marked as done ([PROPOSED]: clarification needed about diversions)

Your message dated Tue, 26 Oct 1999 15:57:20 +0100 (BST) with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#29522: diversions has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Processed: Re: Bug#34223: APT removes essential packages.

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reopen 34223 Bug#34223: apt and packaging manual are in contradiction is already open, cannot reopen. severity 34223 normal Bug#34223: apt and packaging manual are in contradiction Severity set to `normal'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please

Processed: Dpkg can't decide these things

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 37254 packaging-manual Bug#37254: dpkg: update-alternatives madness Bug reassigned from package `dpkg' to `packaging-manual'. stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs

Processed: Re: PROPOSAL: changelog.html.gz sanitization

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: retitle 40934 [ACCEPTED 10/26/99] changelog.html.gz sanitization Bug#40934: PROPOSAL: changelog.html.gz sanitization Changed Bug title. forwarded 40934 debian-policy@lists.debian.org Bug#40934: [ACCEPTED 10/26/99] changelog.html.gz sanitization Noted

Processed: Re: Bug#29522: marked as done ([PROPOSED]: clarification needed about diversions)

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reopen 29522 Bug#29522: [PROPOSED]: clarification needed about diversions Bug reopened, originator not changed. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Processed: Bug#39830: [AMENDMENT]: get rid of undocumented(7) symlinks

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 39830 normal Bug#39830: debian-policy: [PROPOSED]: get rid of undocumented(7) symlinks Severity set to `normal'. retitle 39830 [AMENDMENT 28/10/1999] get rid of undocumented(7) symlinks Bug#39830: debian-policy: [PROPOSED]: get rid of

Processed: policy status update

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: retitle 46522 [AMENDMENT 26/10/99] Amend non-free definition Bug#46522: [PROPOSED] Simplified definition of Non-free Changed Bug title. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Darren Benham (administrator,

Processed: [knghtbrd@debian.org: Re: second on echo -n?]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: retitle 48247 [AMMENDMENT 29/10/99] /bin/sh needs echo -n Bug#48247: [PROPOSED] /bin/sh needs echo -n Changed Bug title. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs

Bug#42634: marked as done ([PROPOSAL] Automatic migration to /usr/share/doc)

Your message dated Fri, 01 Oct 1999 06:49:18 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Close this has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen

Processed: Fixed in NMU debian-policy 3.1.0.0

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 8221 fixed Bug#8221: [REJECTED] Add ispell-dictionary to virtual package list Severity set to `fixed'. severity 17621 fixed Bug#17621: [PROPOSED]: About versions based on dates Severity set to `fixed'. severity 19179 fixed Bug#19179:

Bug#17621: marked as done ([PROPOSED]: About versions based on dates)

Your message dated Sat, 6 Nov 1999 21:13:58 + (GMT) with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Fixed in debian-policy 3.1.0.0 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#19179: marked as done ([PROPOSED]: Shared Libraries clarification (ls -f))

Your message dated Sat, 6 Nov 1999 21:13:58 + (GMT) with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Fixed in debian-policy 3.1.0.0 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#24695: marked as done ([REJECTED] man-browser should be in virtual packages list)

Your message dated Sat, 6 Nov 1999 21:13:58 + (GMT) with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Fixed in debian-policy 3.1.0.0 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#32449: marked as done (Section 3.3.4 (/etc/rc.boot) of policy needs updating)

Your message dated Sat, 6 Nov 1999 21:13:58 + (GMT) with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Fixed in debian-policy 3.1.0.0 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#32448: marked as done ([ACCEPTED 17/08/99] Policy still suggests /etc/rc.boot instead of /etc/rcS.d)

Your message dated Sat, 6 Nov 1999 21:13:58 + (GMT) with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Fixed in debian-policy 3.1.0.0 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#33076: marked as done ([AMENDMENT 1999/02/08] Clarification of extra priority)

Your message dated Sat, 6 Nov 1999 21:13:58 + (GMT) with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Fixed in debian-policy 3.1.0.0 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#40767: marked as done ([PROPOSED] wording cleanup w.r.t. conffile/configuration file)

Your message dated Sat, 6 Nov 1999 21:13:58 + (GMT) with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Fixed in debian-policy 3.1.0.0 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#41121: marked as done ([PROPOSED] Add VISUAL when checking for user's editor)

Your message dated Sat, 6 Nov 1999 21:13:58 + (GMT) with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Fixed in debian-policy 3.1.0.0 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#41547: marked as done ([ACCEPTED 10/08/99] Correct section 3.3 to take account of file-rc)

Your message dated Sat, 6 Nov 1999 21:13:58 + (GMT) with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Fixed in debian-policy 3.1.0.0 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#42358: marked as done (policy says /var/lib/games, FHS says /var/games)

Your message dated Sat, 6 Nov 1999 21:13:58 + (GMT) with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Fixed in debian-policy 3.1.0.0 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#42849: marked as done ([ACCEPTED 17/08/99] FHS-compliant location of compiled examples)

Your message dated Sat, 6 Nov 1999 21:13:58 + (GMT) with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Fixed in debian-policy 3.1.0.0 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#44620: marked as done (packaging-manual: nitpick on section 4.2.14.)

Your message dated Sat, 6 Nov 1999 21:13:58 + (GMT) with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Fixed in debian-policy 3.1.0.0 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#44643: marked as done (packaging-manual: packaging-manual won't install)

Your message dated Sat, 6 Nov 1999 21:13:58 + (GMT) with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Fixed in debian-policy 3.1.0.0 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#43651: marked as done ([AMENDMENT 13/10/1999] mailbox locking)

Your message dated Sat, 6 Nov 1999 21:13:58 + (GMT) with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Fixed in debian-policy 3.1.0.0 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#44922: marked as done ([ACCEPTED 10/26/99] clarify policy on stuff in /var/local)

with SMTP; 12 Sep 1999 16:01:29 - Received: from jae by sanctum with local (Exim 3.03 #1 (Debian)) id 11QC3u-0007vJ-00; Sun, 12 Sep 1999 18:01:06 +0200 From: Juergen A. Erhard [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [PROPOSAL] handling missing stuff in /var

Bug#45307: marked as done ([PROPOSAL] virtual package ident-server)

]) by master.debian.org with SMTP; 17 Sep 1999 01:03:26 - Received: from quango by quango4.watervalley.net with local (Exim 3.03 #1 (Debian)) id 11RmQr-000615-00; Thu, 16 Sep 1999 20:03:21 -0500 From: Chris Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject

Bug#45318: marked as done ([ACCEPTED 07/10/1999] Amend contrib definition)

Your message dated Sat, 6 Nov 1999 21:13:58 + (GMT) with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Fixed in debian-policy 3.1.0.0 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#45561: marked as done ([PROPOSAL] tech-ctte: /usr/share/doc)

Your message dated Sat, 6 Nov 1999 21:13:58 + (GMT) with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Fixed in debian-policy 3.1.0.0 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#48570: marked as done (debian-policy: policy is /usr/share/doc, but debian-policy is in /usr/doc!)

Your message dated Sat, 6 Nov 1999 21:13:58 + (GMT) with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Fixed in debian-policy 3.1.0.0 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#8221: marked as done ([REJECTED] Add ispell-dictionary to virtual package list)

Your message dated Sat, 6 Nov 1999 21:13:58 + (GMT) with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Fixed in debian-policy 3.1.0.0 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#41232: marked as done ([ACCEPTED] Build-time dependencies on binary packages)

Your message dated Sat, 6 Nov 1999 21:13:58 + (GMT) with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Fixed in debian-policy 3.1.0.0 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#49423: marked as done (packaging-manual: packaging-manual should depend on debian-policy.)

Your message dated Sun, 7 Nov 1999 18:10:58 + (GMT) with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#49423: packaging-manual: packaging-manual should depend on debian-policy. has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Processed: Marking bug forwardeed

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: forwarded 49901 debian-policy@lists.debian.org Bug#49901: Correction to the build-dependency spec, Packaging manual section 8.1 Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED] thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me

Processed: I think this belongs against packaging-manual now

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 15709 packaging-manual Bug#15709: dpkg: add a menu entry Bug reassigned from package `dpkg' to `packaging-manual'. retitle 15709 packaging-manual dwww entry Bug#15709: dpkg: add a menu entry Changed Bug title. thanks Stopping processing

Processed: Fixed in NMU debian-policy 3.1.1.0

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 49901 fixed Bug#49901: Correction to the build-dependency spec, Packaging manual section 8.1 Severity set to `fixed'. quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs

Bug#49901: marked as done (Correction to the build-dependency spec, Packaging manual section 8.1)

Your message dated Wed, 17 Nov 1999 03:20:57 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Closed with policy 3.1.1.0 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Processed: Bug#50832: [AMENDMENT] Clarify meaning of Essential: yes

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: close 50832 Bug#50832: [PROPOSED] Clarify meaning of Essential: yes Bug closed, ack sent to submitter - they'd better know why ! reopen 50832 Bug#50832: [PROPOSED] Clarify meaning of Essential: yes Bug reopened, originator not changed. retitle 50832

Processed: Re: debian-policy: mail locking in Debian is _not_ NFS safe

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 43529 fixed Bug#43529: debian-policy: mail locking in Debian is _not_ NFS safe Severity set to `fixed'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Processed:

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reopen 51411 Bug#51411: build-essential does not include debhelper Bug reopened, originator not changed. reopen 51412 Bug#51412: conflict in documents Bug reopened, originator not changed. reassign 51411 debian-policy Bug#51411: build-essential does

Processed: Fixed in NMU debian-policy 3.1.1.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 50502 fixed Bug#50502: Packaging manual typo /var/lib/dpkg/*.shlibs Severity set to `fixed'. severity 50857 fixed Bug#50857: Packaging-manual has typos. Severity set to `fixed'. quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need

Bug#50502: marked as done (Packaging manual typo /var/lib/dpkg/*.shlibs)

Your message dated Mon, 29 Nov 1999 00:38:58 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Closed in debian-policy/packaging-manual 3.1.1.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#50857: marked as done (Packaging-manual has typos.)

Your message dated Mon, 29 Nov 1999 00:38:58 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Closed in debian-policy/packaging-manual 3.1.1.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#51262: Info received (was Bug#51262: Suggestion: Packages should carry a manpage )

Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this problem report. It has been forwarded to the developer(s) and to the developers mailing list to accompany the original report. Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s): Debian Policy List

Bug#39299: marked as done ([AMENDED PROPOSAL] Permit use of bz2 for source packages)

with SMTP; 10 Jun 1999 19:02:41 - Received: from cnlawren by humberto.polisci.olemiss.edu with local (Exim 2.11 #1 (Debian)) id 10sA60-0006r2-00; Thu, 10 Jun 1999 14:02:36 -0500 From: Chris Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [PROPOSAL

Processed: I think this belongs against packaging-manual now

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 17369 packaging-manual Bug#17369: Additional info to packaging 8.3. Bug reassigned from package `packaging-manual' to `packaging-manual'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Darren Benham

Processed: Making /usr/doc/XXX symbolic link to ../share/doc/XXX is BAD idea

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 47298 debian-policy Bug#47298: Making /usr/doc/XXX symbolic link to ../share/doc/XXX is BAD idea Bug reassigned from package `libcgi-perl' to `debian-policy'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Darren

Processed: Re: [Various] Bug#58759: Request for new virtual packages: rsh-client and telnet-client

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: retitle 58759 [ACCEPTED] Request for new virtual packages: rsh-client and telnet-client Bug#58759: Request for new virtual packages: rsh-client and telnet-client Changed Bug title. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need

Processed: X Window System policy proposals

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: retitle 53755 [ACCEPTED 02/01/2000] policy for usage of xserver alternative Bug#53755: [PROPOSED] policy for usage of xserver alternative Changed Bug title. retitle 53756 [ACCEPTED 02/01/2000] additions to virtual package list Bug#53756: [PROPOSED]

Processed: Updating the BTS, in preparation for a policy package update

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 34610 wishlist Bug#34610: unsuffixed shared libraries Severity set to `wishlist'. severity 35510 wishlist Bug#35510: mirror license seems Debian-specific Severity set to `wishlist'. severity 41902 wishlist Bug#41902: Test suite proposal

Processed: dpkg: update-alternatives madness

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 37254 dpkg Bug#37254: dpkg: update-alternatives madness Bug reassigned from package `packaging-manual' to `dpkg'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Processed: Do not make hardlinks to conffiles

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reopen 22935 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#22935: [REJECTED] Do not make hardlinks to conffiles Bug reopened, originator set to [EMAIL PROTECTED] End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Darren Benham

Processed: Re: Processed: Do not make hardlinks to conffiles

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: close 22935 Bug#22935: [REJECTED] Do not make hardlinks to conffiles Bug closed, ack sent to submitter - they'd better know why ! thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs

Processed: should have been reassigned not closed (or bugs I agree with)

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reopen 11094 Bug#11094: [REJECTED] Policy should mention that serial lines require UUCP-style locking Bug reopened, originator not changed. reopen 20373 Bug#20373: [REJECTED] shouldn't start init scripts in wrong runlevel Bug reopened, originator not

Processed: [PROPOSAL] Permissions of /var/log.

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 35504 debian-policy Bug#35504: base2_1.tgz: ownership/permissions of /var/log (?). Bug reassigned from package `base-files' to `debian-policy'. retitle 35504 [PROPOSAL] Permissions of /var/log. Bug#35504: base2_1.tgz: ownership/permissions of

Processed: reassign to debian-policy

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 61058 debian-policy Bug#61058: FHS: /usr/local/share/man instead of /usr/local/man ? Bug reassigned from package `man-db' to `debian-policy'. severity 61058 normal Bug#61058: FHS: /usr/local/share/man instead of /usr/local/man ? Severity set

Bug#61058: marked as forwarded (FHS: /usr/local/share/man instead of /usr/local/man ?)

-2Ne-00; Fri, 24 Mar 2000 19:08:27 +0100 Received: from flight by freefly.hoffleit.org with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 12YXyq-0004vn-00; Fri, 24 Mar 2000 18:34:40 +0100 Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2000 18:34:39 +0100 From: Gregor Hoffleit [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL

Processed: Re: Permissions of /var/log.

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 35504 base-files Bug#35504: [PROPOSAL] Permissions of /var/log. Bug reassigned from package `debian-policy' to `base-files'. retitle 35504 /var/log should be 755 and root.root Bug#35504: [PROPOSAL] Permissions of /var/log. Changed Bug title.

Processed: Bug#61308. Status change.

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: close 61308 Bug#61308: [PROPOSAL] Initializing databases by using conffiles. Bug closed, ack sent to submitter - they'd better know why ! reopen 61308 Bug#61308: [PROPOSAL] Initializing databases by using conffiles. Bug reopened, originator not

Processed: Reassignment at request of filer

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 62070 debian-policy Bug#62070: Package freeze makes no sense for package Bug reassigned from package `anarchism' to `debian-policy'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Darren Benham (administrator,

Processed: Re: Bug#61308: Status change.

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: retitle 61308 [AMMENDMENT 22/04/2000] About the use of conffiles Bug#61308: [PROPOSAL] Initializing databases by using conffiles. Changed Bug title. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Darren Benham

Bug#62943: marked as done (debian-policy omits packaging manual)

Your message dated Mon, 24 Apr 2000 23:48:47 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#62943: debian-policy omits packaging manual has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Processed: Re: Bug#62996: dhttpd doesn't support CGI

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 62996 debian-policy Bug#62996: dhttpd doesn't support CGI Bug reassigned from package `doc-central' to `debian-policy'. retitle 62996 no way to detect webservers without CGI support Bug#62996: dhttpd doesn't support CGI Changed Bug title.

Processed: Bug#62946: Status change. Update for new non-US layout.

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: close 62946 Bug#62946: [AMENDMENT 25-04-2000] Update for new non-US layout Bug closed, ack sent to submitter - they'd better know why ! reopen 62946 Bug#62946: [AMENDMENT 25-04-2000] Update for new non-US layout Bug reopened, originator not changed.

Processed: Bug#62947: Status change. s/debian-devel/debian-legal/

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: close 62947 Bug#62947: [AMENDMENT 25-04-2000] s/debian-devel/debian-legal/ Bug closed, ack sent to submitter - they'd better know why ! reopen 62947 Bug#62947: [AMENDMENT 25-04-2000] s/debian-devel/debian-legal/ Bug reopened, originator not changed.

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >