Your message dated Sat, 6 Nov 1999 21:13:58 +0000 (GMT)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in debian-policy 3.1.0.0
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Jul 1998 10:52:51 +0000
Received: (qmail 15431 invoked from network); 17 Jul 1998 10:52:49 -0000
Received: from smtp11.odn.ne.jp (143.90.130.41)
by debian.novare.net with SMTP; 17 Jul 1998 10:52:49 -0000
Received: from localhost ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [143.90.218.39])
by smtp11.odn.ne.jp (8.8.6/3.6W/9807081231) with ESMTP id TAA29319;
Fri, 17 Jul 1998 19:52:45 +0900 (JST)
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: debian-policy@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Dependency issue of the manpages
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 27 Jun 1998 11:54:47 +0900"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: Mew version 1.93b33 on XEmacs 20.4 (Emerald)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 1998 19:55:21 +0900
From: Keita Maehara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Dispatcher: imput version 980506
Lines: 40
Package: debian-policy
Version: 2.4.1.2
From: Keita Maehara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Dependency issue of the manpages
Date: Sat, 27 Jun 1998 11:54:47 +0900
> I'm a maintainer of the package manpages-ja and I've received a bug
> report which says "manpages-ja depends on man-db. It should suggest
> man-browser instead". But man-browser is not in the
> virtual-package-names-list. So I've checked the dependency of the
> manpages:
>
> man-db Provides: man-browser
> manpages Suggests: man-browser
> manpages-dev Suggests: man-browser
> manpages-de Suggests: man
> manpages-de-dev Suggests: man
> manpages-es Suggests: man-browser
> manpages-fr Depends : man-db | man
> manpages-ko Suggests: man-browser
> manpages-it Suggests: man-browser
> manpages-ja Depends : man-db
>
> Then it seems apropriate that:
>
> 1. man-browser should go into the virtual-package-names-list.
> 2. manpages-de and manpages-de-dev should suggest man-browser.
> 3. manpages-fr should suggest (not depend) man-browser.
> 4. manpages-ja should suggest (not depend) man-browser.
>
> Is this right?
There was no reply to this, but it seems 1. is a bug of
virtual-package-names-list.text.gz in debian-policy. When it is fixed,
I'll submit bug reports for 2. and 3.
----
Keita Maehara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PGP Key fingerprint = 82 37 2F 1E 06 ED C4 37 1E E2 C2 96 22 B8 B3 F1
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 24695-done) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Nov 1999 21:31:43 +0000
Received: (qmail 17140 invoked from network); 6 Nov 1999 21:15:11 -0000
Received: from mserv1c.u-net.net (195.102.240.33)
by master.debian.org with SMTP; 6 Nov 1999 21:15:11 -0000
Received: from [195.102.196.44] (helo=polya)
by mserv1c.u-net.net with esmtp (Exim 2.10 #35)
id 11kD9x-0005Qp-00; Sat, 6 Nov 1999 21:14:05 +0000
Received: from jdg by polya with local (Exim 3.03 #1 (Debian))
id 11kD9q-0000Vf-00; Sat, 06 Nov 1999 21:13:58 +0000
Subject: Fixed in debian-policy 3.1.0.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 6 Nov 1999 21:13:58 +0000 (GMT)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL60 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
These bugs have been fixed in debian-policy 3.1.0.0; changelog follows.
Julian
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Julian Gilbey, Dept of Maths, QMW, Univ. of London. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian GNU/Linux Developer, see http://www.debian.org/~jdg
Changes: debian-policy (3.1.0.0) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Add instructions on /usr/doc -> /usr/share/doc symlinks (closes:
#45561, #42447, #48570)
* Added source dependencies (closes: #41232)
* Deprecated /etc/rc.boot (closes: #32448, #32449)
* Update-rc.d now only legal way to automatically access /etc/rc?.d
directoried (closes: #41547)
* FHS compliant location of examples (closes: #42849)
* Added ispell-dictionary to virtual-packages.list (following new
suggestions: no objections => accept) (closes: #8221)
* Added man-browser to virtual-packages.list (closes: #24695)
* Added ident-server to virtual-packages.list (closes: #45307)
* Alphabeticised virtual packages list ;)
* Corrected GPL reference in proposal.sgml
* Clarification of "extra" priority (closes: #33076)
* Remove buggy and seriously problematic licenses from list of contrib
package criteria (closes: #45318)
* Move docs to /usr/share/doc with a compatibility symlink (closes:
#41829)
* Update to FHS 2.1 draft #3 (for /var/state etc. changes).
* Correct /var/lib/games -> /var/games (closes: #42358)
* Added MIME subpolicy (closes: #46516)
* Added support for VISUAL (closes: #41121)
* Clarify non-dependence on /usr/local (closes: #44922)
* Modified description of mail spool locking (closes: #43651)
* Clarified wording of conffiles and configuration files (closes:
#40766, #40767)
* Changed description of release numbers (closes: #44620)
* Added changelog.html -> changelog requirement (closes: $40934)
* packaging-manual now correctly installs its docs (closes: #44643)
* The packaging manual now discusses version numbers based on dates
(closes: #17621)
* Mention ls -f for testing order in which files appear on disk (closes:
#19179)
* Change order of '.' and '+' in description of version numbers (closes:
#41095)
* s/fields/field names/ in section 4.1 of packaging manual for clarity
* Add Build-Depends-Indep: field to control file
