On 27-Jun-01, 07:09 (CDT), Julian Gilbey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Agreed. So should we close this bug report?
Yes, please.
Steve
--
Steve Greenland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 25 June 2001 08:41:09 +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
Please see the original proposal: the problem was precisely that there
were situations where these directories were not in the PATH and this
broke the scripts.
Only because the user's system was misconfigured...
Let's go for
On Mon, Jun 25, 2001 at 08:41:09AM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
Julian Gilbey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 09:08:10AM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
I'd really like to see the list expanded to include /sbin and /usr/sbin
as well. My rationale is that init.d scripts are
On Mon, Jun 25, 2001 at 09:26:20AM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
misconfigured, then that solves his problem. Does the general
suggestion retain much value, though?
Personally I don't see why a root user should have a PATH that does not
contain sbin and /usr/sbin.
--
Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 is
On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 09:08:10AM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
On 21-Jun-01, 17:33 (CDT), Julian Gilbey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Scripts which use programs in a directory other than /usr/bin and
/bin (and /usr/bin/X11?) should append that directory to the PATH
I'd really like to see the
On 23-Jun-01, 17:36 (CDT), Julian Gilbey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 09:08:10AM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
On 21-Jun-01, 17:33 (CDT), Julian Gilbey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Scripts which use programs in a directory other than /usr/bin and
/bin (and /usr/bin/X11?)
Julian Gilbey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 09:08:10AM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
I'd really like to see the list expanded to include /sbin and /usr/sbin
as well. My rationale is that init.d scripts are intended (and mostly
Please see the original proposal: the problem
On 21-Jun-01, 17:33 (CDT), Julian Gilbey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Scripts which use programs in a directory other than /usr/bin and
/bin (and /usr/bin/X11?) should append that directory to the PATH
I'd really like to see the list expanded to include /sbin and /usr/sbin
as well. My rationale is
Steve Greenland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd really like to see the list expanded to include /sbin and /usr/sbin
as well. My rationale is that init.d scripts are intended (and mostly
only useful) for the root user, and the the whole point of /sbin
and /usr/sbin is to contain scripts useful
On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 07:44:59AM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
Steve Greenland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bug #36151: etc/init.d scripts should specify an explicit PATH
Summary: init.d scripts shouldn't depend on having PATH set in a
useful manner -- they should explicitly set the PATH. Not
Steve Greenland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bug #36151: etc/init.d scripts should specify an explicit PATH
Summary: init.d scripts shouldn't depend on having PATH set in a
useful manner -- they should explicitly set the PATH. Not much
discussion in the bug logs, and most of the
11 matches
Mail list logo
