reassign 37254 dpkg
thanks
Hi,
Since the packaging manual already contains the correct text,
I am sending this back to dpkg, as decided.
manoj
--
Being schizophrenic is better than living alone.
Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/
I agree that update-alternatives shouldn't put an alternative into
manual mode because a _target_ disappeared unexpectedly. I'll look
into this eventually.
But, the problem doesn't happen if you call update-alternatives in the
prerm, which is where you should. So it would be good if the
Previously Julian Gilbey wrote:
Do we need to then specify this in the policy manual, or will it be
sufficient to file bugs against packages which don't have the needed
update-alternatives in their prerm?
No need to put this in the policy manual. The policy manual is for
policies, not for
Previously Julian Gilbey wrote:
Do we need to then specify this in the policy manual, or will it be
sufficient to file bugs against packages which don't have the needed
update-alternatives in their prerm?
No need to put this in the policy manual. The policy manual is for
policies, not
4 matches
Mail list logo
