On Mon, 15 Aug 2011, Luca Falavigna wrote:
Right. Could someone update the patch?
Patch refreshed with Santiago's suggestions.
I took the time to expand it a little bit.
I merged it but I changed the wording (hopefully improving it!).
Cf attached patch.
Thanks for your contribution!
tags 569219 + patch
thanks
Il 30/07/2011 16:02, Lucas Nussbaum ha scritto:
For the purpose of removing useless packages, I would propose that
transitional packages are always priority: extra and section: oldlibs.
That would make deborphan to mark them as packages that may be removed.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 569219 + patch
Bug #569219 [developers-reference] Document transitional and meta-packages
Added tag(s) patch.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
569219:
tags 569219 - patch
thanks
On 25/02/10 at 11:23 +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
On Wed, 10 Feb 2010, Luca Falavigna wrote:
Package: developers-reference
Version: 3.4.3
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
We have several meta-packages and transitional packages in the archive,
some of
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 569219 - patch
Bug #569219 [developers-reference] Document transitional and meta-packages
Removed tag(s) patch.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
569219:
On Wed, 10 Feb 2010, Luca Falavigna wrote:
Package: developers-reference
Version: 3.4.3
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
We have several meta-packages and transitional packages in the archive, some
of them do not document that anywhere in their description.
Users should be given such an
Package: developers-reference
Version: 3.4.3
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
We have several meta-packages and transitional packages in the archive, some of
them do not document that anywhere in their description.
Users should be given such an information, so they can decide to remove some to
7 matches
Mail list logo