Bug#636383: debian-policy: 10.2 and others: private libraries may also be multi-arch-ified

2017-11-30 Thread Simon McVittie
On Sun, 04 Dec 2011 at 16:04:17 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > Shared object files (often .so files) that are not > public libraries, that is, they are not meant to be linked > to by third party executables (binaries of other packages), > - should be installed in

Bug#636383: debian-policy: 10.2 and others: private libraries may also be multi-arch-ified

2017-10-14 Thread Sean Whitton
Hello, On Sat, Oct 14 2017, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > Seconded. Thanks. > Triviality: could you please (in the changelog, upgrading checklist, > etc) word this change to mean "allow private libraries to be placed in > a multiarch location" rather than "disallow private libraries to be > places

Bug#636383: debian-policy: 10.2 and others: private libraries may also be multi-arch-ified

2017-10-14 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 11:36:55AM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote: > diff --git a/policy.sgml b/policy.sgml > index b8db0ab..d0baa1b 100644 > --- a/policy.sgml > +++ b/policy.sgml > @@ -7697,8 +7697,9 @@ strip --strip-unneeded your-lib > Shared object files (often .so files) that are not >

Processed: Re: Bug#636383: debian-policy: 10.2 and others: private libraries may also be multi-arch-ified

2017-10-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 +patch Bug #636383 [debian-policy] debian-policy: 10.2 and others: private libraries may also be multi-arch-ified Added tag(s) patch. -- 636383: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=636383 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact

Bug#636383: debian-policy: 10.2 and others: private libraries may also be multi-arch-ified

2017-10-14 Thread Sean Whitton
control: tag -1 +patch Hello, On Sun, Dec 04, 2011 at 04:33:56PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > How about the attached patch ? Do you think it is clear enough that > /usr/lib/triplet is not allowed ? Seconded: diff --git a/policy.sgml b/policy.sgml index b8db0ab..d0baa1b 100644 ---

Re: Bug#636383: debian-policy: 10.2 and others: private libraries may also be multi-arch-ified

2011-12-04 Thread Simon McVittie
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Sun, 04 Dec 2011 at 16:33:56 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: diff --git a/policy.sgml b/policy.sgml index b8db0ab..d0baa1b 100644 --- a/policy.sgml +++ b/policy.sgml @@ -7697,8 +7697,9 @@ strip --strip-unneeded varyour-lib/var Shared

Re: Bug#636383: debian-policy: 10.2 and others: private libraries may also be multi-arch-ified

2011-12-03 Thread Simon McVittie
On Sat, 03 Dec 2011 at 15:17:29 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: We could resolve this by either disallowing to use file/usr/lib/vartriplet/var/file, or by explaining that the subdirectory must be private to the package or to a set of collaborating packages, as the non-public libraries themselves.

Bug#636383: debian-policy: 10.2 and others: private libraries may also be multi-arch-ified

2011-12-03 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Sat, Dec 03, 2011 at 10:20:41AM +, Simon McVittie a écrit : On Sat, 03 Dec 2011 at 15:17:29 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: We could resolve this by either disallowing to use file/usr/lib/vartriplet/var/file, or by explaining that the subdirectory must be private to the package or to a

Bug#636383: debian-policy: 10.2 and others: private libraries may also be multi-arch-ified

2011-12-02 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 10:07:40PM +0200, Julian Andres Klode a écrit : Policy 10.2 states: Shared object files (often .so files) that are not public libraries, that is, they are not meant to be linked to by third party executables (binaries of other packages), should be installed in

Bug#636383: debian-policy: 10.2 and others: private libraries may also be multi-arch-ified

2011-12-02 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Charles Plessy wrote: Would you or somebody eles mind if I close this bug report ? I would mind. The current wording implies that installing a non-public library directly under /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ is fine, which is clearly wrong. Regards, Jonathan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

Bug#636383: debian-policy: 10.2 and others: private libraries may also be multi-arch-ified

2011-12-02 Thread Charles Plessy
user debian-pol...@packages.debian.org usertags 636383 normative discussion thanks Le Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 11:29:43PM -0600, Jonathan Nieder a écrit : The current wording implies that installing a non-public library directly under /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ is fine, which is

Bug#636383: debian-policy: 10.2 and others: private libraries may also be multi-arch-ified

2011-08-02 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Package: debian-policy Severity: normal Policy 10.2 states: Shared object files (often .so files) that are not public libraries, that is, they are not meant to be linked to by third party executables (binaries of other packages), should be installed in subdirectories of the /usr/lib directory.