Bug#882445: Proposed change of offensive packages to -offensive [and 1 more messages]

2017-11-30 Thread Sean Whitton
control: tag -1 -patch +pending Hello Ian, On Thu, Nov 30 2017, Ian Jackson wrote: >> Is this a proposal/seconding of the modified patch? > > Sure. Thanks for confirming that. > Thanks for keeping on top of this. > > But, I guess you already know that I think that this is excessive >

Processed: Re: Bug#882445: Proposed change of offensive packages to -offensive [and 1 more messages]

2017-11-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 -patch +pending Bug #882445 [debian-policy] Proposed change of offensive packages to -offensive Removed tag(s) patch. Bug #882445 [debian-policy] Proposed change of offensive packages to -offensive Added tag(s) pending. -- 882445:

Bug#882445: Proposed change of offensive packages to -offensive [and 1 more messages]

2017-11-30 Thread Ian Jackson
Sean Whitton writes ("Bug#882445: Proposed change of offensive packages to -offensive [and 1 more messages]"): > On Thu, Nov 23 2017, Ian Jackson wrote: > > I'm not wedded to this second half of the sentence. > > Is this a proposal/seconding of the modified patch? Sure. > This bug needs one

Bug#882445: Proposed change of offensive packages to -offensive [and 1 more messages]

2017-11-24 Thread Sean Whitton
Hello Ian, On Thu, Nov 23 2017, Ian Jackson wrote: > I'm not wedded to this second half of the sentence. Is this a proposal/seconding of the modified patch? This bug needs one more second to be applied to the Policy repo. -- Sean Whitton signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#882445: Proposed change of offensive packages to -offensive [and 1 more messages]

2017-11-23 Thread Ian Jackson
David Kalnischkies writes ("Re: Bug#882445: Proposed change of offensive packages to -offensive"): > On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 05:18:37PM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote: > > > "cowsay-offensive". In this situation the "-offensive" package can > > > be Suggested by the core package(s), but should