Bug#99933: Comments on Unicode

2001-07-08 Thread David Starner
- Original Message - From: Raul Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#99933: Comments on Unicode On Fri, Jul 06, 2001 at 04:36:25AM +0100, David Starner wrote: Once unicode can act as a super set for every character set we currently support, we can use it as such. Until

Bug#99933: Comments on Unicode

2001-07-06 Thread Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
On 20010705T133736-0400, Raul Miller wrote: in HTML the language can only be identified in the mime header. There is no such thing as a MIME header in HTML. Besides, HTML does include the lang attribute for most elements. I wonder what it's for if not for indicating the language. -- %%%

Bug#99933: Comments on Unicode

2001-07-06 Thread Raul Miller
On Fri, Jul 06, 2001 at 04:36:25AM +0100, David Starner wrote: Do you have any idea whether the problems identified at http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q170/5/59.ASP have been resolved? Are they a problem for us? Windows Code Page 932 may or may not correspond to anything

Bug#99933: Comments on Unicode

2001-07-05 Thread David Starner
Raul Miller: Which implies that this mechanism isn't useful for representing different languages in the same document. That, instead, it's logically equivalent to a MIME declaration of the document's language. I don't know where you got this impression, but it's wrong. Read the document. It

Bug#99933: Comments on Unicode

2001-07-05 Thread Raul Miller
Raul Miller: Which implies that this mechanism isn't useful for representing different languages in the same document. That, instead, it's logically equivalent to a MIME declaration of the document's language. On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 06:55:24AM +0100, David Starner wrote: I don't know