The following proposal tries to address cases like Bug #34294.
\begin{proposal}
Do not initialize a text database by using the conffile mechanism.
\end{proposal}
Rationale: We should try to reduce prompting to a minimum during upgrades.
99,999% users will always say No to dpkg prompt. In
On Wed, 29 Mar 2000, Steve Greenland wrote:
It's already in violation of policy. From section 4.7.3:
The other way to do it is to via the maintainer scripts. In this case,
the configuration file must not be listed as a conffile and must not be
part of the package distribution.
[...]
I
Your message dated Thu, 30 Mar 2000 12:18:47 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line /usr/local/man - /usr/local/share/man
has caused the Debian Bug report #61058,
regarding FHS: /usr/local/share/man instead of /usr/local/man ?
to be marked as having been forwarded to the upstream
On Thu, 30 Mar 2000, Mark Baker wrote:
They probably should be group adm, though.
I would like that, it is annoying to have to add all the admin people to
all sorts of groups (with unknown other repercussions) just so they can
read logs.
I think group adm should allow the reading of most, if
4 matches
Mail list logo
