Package: debian-policy
Version: 4.1.3.0
We had another thread on debian-devel recently, in which it once again
became evident that epochs are misunderstood. Epoch bumps should be
rare and there are often better solutions. I suggest that we should
ask people to consult debian-devel.
Also we shou
Ian Jackson writes:
> Package: debian-policy
> Version: 4.1.3.0
>
> We had another thread on debian-devel recently, in which it once again
> became evident that epochs are misunderstood. Epoch bumps should be
> rare and there are often better solutions. I suggest that we should
> ask people to
David Bremner writes ("Bug#891216: Requre d-devel consultation for epoch bump"):
> I find the existing use of the debian-devel list in policy strange, and
> am unenthusiastic about expanding it. It's not a "must-read" list for
> debian contributors, and it is (or was, last time I subscribed) an
>
Hi!
On Fri, 2018-02-23 at 13:26:01 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Package: debian-policy
> Version: 4.1.3.0
> We had another thread on debian-devel recently, in which it once again
> became evident that epochs are misunderstood. Epoch bumps should be
> rare and there are often better solutions. I
4 matches
Mail list logo
