Re: Apple vs. IBM

1999-08-04 Thread Jeramy B Smith
Damn shopping cart, I tried the link on another computer and it actually worked. I took away the atrocious links and just posted the nitty-gritty details. Your link at IBM is broken, since it was for your personal shopping cart only. But are you considering different memory architectures,

Re: Apple vs. IBM

1999-08-04 Thread Cort Dougan
The claims about IBM there aren't too accurate. They're not so out of touch. Look who they're selling rs6k's to. Big companies that want _full_ support 24/7 with AIX. They're willing to pay a lot for the support they get from IBM. For Linux, that's way off base but they only recently turned

Re: About PowerPC processors

1999-08-04 Thread Cort Dougan
Debian on PPC is almost unheard of. Being more public would be good :) } It seems that many people who want to get real work done are going } for Debian... we should sell ourselves better.

Umax APUS 2000: will only boot 2.1.24

1999-08-04 Thread Martin Keegan
I've tried the kernels from the kernel packages for 2.2.1 and 2.2.9 and tried compiling my own 2.2.9 and 2.2.10 kernels to boot a Umax APUS powerpc clone, to no avail. The only kernel it wants to run is the 2.1.24 kernel on Paul McKerras's ancient installer disk. Either quik or OF fails with the

Re: Apple vs. IBM

1999-08-04 Thread Joel Klecker
At 18:22 -0500 1999-08-03, Jeramy B Smith wrote: you only get PCI. The Apple has a True66mhz PCI which can be used for SCSI or graphics depending on whether your running in workstation or server configuration as well as the standard 33hz slots intel uses. Both systems use 32bit PCI slots.

RES: Apple vs. IBM

1999-08-04 Thread Leandro Dutra
3. Sun Ultra5 machines (which start at $2400) outsell 43P150 machines by a large margin. All right, but last time I searched Ultra5 was an IDE, limited upgrade machine... 256 colors only! not workstations. If service and support are so expensive, they should be made an option

Re: About PowerPC processors

1999-08-04 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
We try :) On Tue, Aug 03, 1999 at 05:27:59PM -0600, Cort Dougan wrote: Debian on PPC is almost unheard of. Being more public would be good :) } It seems that many people who want to get real work done are going } for Debian... we should sell ourselves better. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE,

Re: Apple vs. IBM

1999-08-04 Thread S. Ryan Quick
I have to say, as someone who makes almost 90% of my money off AIX and Big Blue, that while the same types of questions have always bugged me--why are Macs cheaper when you get more? Why is IBM so out of touch with the 43P?--I have to give credit where it is due to IBM. The fact of the matter is

Re: Apple vs. IBM

1999-08-04 Thread Jeramy B Smith
You can PCI cards to it. IDE is fine for workstations. Add a PCI scsi card. Even with a scsi card or ATI video card, it is still a good deal for 360mhz ultrasparc workstation. We use them for firwalls and small servers. - Original Message - From: Leandro Dutra [EMAIL PROTECTED] To:

Re: Apple vs. IBM

1999-08-04 Thread Jeramy B Smith
- Original Message - From: Joel Klecker [EMAIL PROTECTED] That's not quite correct, the Blue White PowerMac G3 has one 32-bit/66MHz PCI slot, and 3 64-bit/33MHz PCI slots. -- Even better. I wish they had a 64-bit 66mhz slot though. Gigabit ethernet could really use that kind of

Re: About PowerPC processors

1999-08-04 Thread Tom Rini
On Wed, 4 Aug 1999, Hartmut Koptein wrote: Debian on PPC is almost unheard of. Being more public would be good :) How can i/we do this? Working fulltime on this for nothing isn't always funny. No, no it isn't. Debian is sometimes slow, but we do it right(TM) :-) As long as fixes get

Re: RES: About PowerPC processors

1999-08-04 Thread Wichert Akkerman
Previously Illuminatus Primus wrote: I was told by a VA rep that they were considering supporting Debian again. Reportedly, internally they are mostly Debian :). They sell Debian boxes on request I think and are considering make it a standard option. Wichert. --

Re: Printing, USB and Centronics...

1999-08-04 Thread Coffee Cup
That is, assuming USB is working in the PowerPC under Linux or shortly will be. USB works alright, just in very limited amounts. As far as I am informed the current version of the USB interface that most of the market goes by is 1.16 ... however, as far as I know, the current kernel or the

Re: rotfl

1999-08-04 Thread Coffee Cup
Had to happen -CC

Re: Apple vs. IBM

1999-08-04 Thread Phillip R. Jaenke
On Tue, Aug 03, 1999 at 04:39:33PM -0500, Jeramy B Smith wrote: In light of the recent board discussion, I decided to price some full PowerPC systems. Check it out at www.corplinux.com/powerpenguin if your interested. Alternately, one of my preferred vendors for my home RS/6000's is a company

Re: About PowerPC processors

1999-08-04 Thread Phillip R. Jaenke
On Tue, Aug 03, 1999 at 05:19:33PM -0600, Cort Dougan wrote: IBM Microelectronics doesn't plan on making longtrails again but they're looking for someone who will so they can donate or loan the design. They're quite happy to do that. I picked up the schematics and layout from the ftp someone

Re: Apple vs. IBM

1999-08-04 Thread Phillip R. Jaenke
On Tue, Aug 03, 1999 at 06:22:57PM -0500, Jeramy B Smith wrote: But are you considering different memory architectures, buses and video cards? AFAIK these factor much more into the equipment prices than clock speed or memory amount. With the G3, you get Firewire, USB, and multiple PCI

Re: About PowerPC board production run

1999-08-04 Thread Phillip R. Jaenke
On Tue, Aug 03, 1999 at 04:26:49PM -0500, Jeramy B Smith wrote: This is all well and great but bad from a business standpoint.First, sell iMacs preloaded with Linux to raise capital. Market them for Linux hobbyists interested in alternative architectures. Same for Powerbooks. Call them iMax

Re: Apple vs. IBM

1999-08-04 Thread Phillip R. Jaenke
On Tue, Aug 03, 1999 at 06:51:00PM -0500, Jeramy B Smith wrote: The claims about IBM there aren't too accurate. They're not so out of touch. Look who they're selling rs6k's to. Big companies that want _full_ support 24/7 with AIX. They're willing to pay a lot for the support they get

Re: Umax APUS 2000: will only boot 2.1.24

1999-08-04 Thread Konstantinos Margaritis
On Wed, 4 Aug 1999, Martin Keegan wrote: I've tried the kernels from the kernel packages for 2.2.1 and 2.2.9 and tried compiling my own 2.2.9 and 2.2.10 kernels to boot a Umax APUS powerpc clone, to no avail. The only kernel it wants to run is the 2.1.24 kernel on Paul McKerras's ancient

Re: Apple vs. IBM

1999-08-04 Thread Adrian Cox
Phillip R. Jaenke wrote: This is wrong wrong wrong. First off, the *truly* blatant error. IBM does NOT use SDRAM in the RS/6000. Period. Flat out WRONG and INCORRECT. They use ECC, which is about 3x as much as SDRAM anyways. http://www.rs6000.ibm.com/hardware/workgroups/43p_150_specs.html says

Re: Apple vs. IBM

1999-08-04 Thread Alexander S. Guy
Phillip == Phillip R Jaenke [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: This is kinda off topic, but no more than has been discussed so far,.. if anyone wants us to shut up, just holler... Phillip Never trust information to the uninitiated. Phillip This is wrong wrong wrong. First off, the *truly*

Re: Apple vs. IBM

1999-08-04 Thread Tom Rini
On Wed, 4 Aug 1999, Alexander S. Guy wrote: Phillip == Phillip R Jaenke [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Phillip G3 has 'True66MHz' PCI, which doesn't exist as far as I'm Phillip concerned, with the G3, due to the way the G3 was Phillip designed and implemented. Power260 has 66MHz

Re: Debian PowerPC/Joys Woes

1999-08-04 Thread Lee W. Kuo
On Tue, 3 Aug 1999, Alexander S. Guy wrote: C or two error messages to hundreds), Window Maker (touching the C clip is a sure way of crashing the window server), sound, and C so on. Perl is still hit and miss, as well -- some modules and The latest Window Maker out of Potato has

Re: Apple vs. IBM: Final Post

1999-08-04 Thread Jeramy B Smith
My article was meant to be provocative and certainly was. Of course, aside from the pricing facts, everything was IMHO. Let's find a common ground here. I think everyone can agree that buying PowerPC equipment for running Linux directly from IBM is not cost effective. As far as being out of touch