I can't seem to create a working 2.4 kernel in debian ppc.
Maybe the problem is that boot X doesn't support 2.4 kernels?
I would like to have a working 2.4 kernel so I could get a voodoo3 and
actually have X running at a decent speed on my starmax 4000/200 at the
high res I put it on.
Also, I'd
On Wed, Oct 04, 2000 at 01:50:14AM +, Cameron Berkenpas wrote:
I can't seem to create a working 2.4 kernel in debian ppc.
Maybe the problem is that boot X doesn't support 2.4 kernels?
I would like to have a working 2.4 kernel so I could get a voodoo3 and
actually have X running at a decent
Pepijn Bruienne wrote:
I followed the instructions to install XFree86 4.01 with the current
development drivers (through rsync) for tdfx support as listed on
penguinppc.org/usr/xf4. After a compile and a full recompile (the first
attempt made a total mess of the Debian install) I now am able
Hi,
I'm really annoying, sorry...
Quoting Michel Dänzer [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
What do the Debian XFree packages include ?
XFree86 CVS from sometime after 4.0.1c + PPC patches from Ani Joshi's
rsync
tree.
Good enough for DRI ?
If I understand well, I could get:
X Strike-force deb
Fixed it!! I'm very happy.
I tried turning off gpm, but it was just the same. The trick was to
recompile the kernel. There is an option which is:
CONFIG_FB_COMPAT_XPMAC
make sure this is set to Y. Then patch the kernel with the patch on the
potato CD originating from Ben H. (I tried
Hi!
On Tue, Oct 03, 2000 at 03:54:33PM +0100, Sergio Brandano wrote:
I am using libc6 2.1.3-10, that also seems the only one available
for woody, together with exim 3.16-3.1 and I am reporting no
problems so far. Where did you get libc6 2.1.94 from? The c libs
I guess my wording is not
On Tue, Oct 03, 2000 at 08:27:58PM +0100, Paul Talacko wrote:
I went and got Xpmac. It works! Well sort of. My mouse freezes in X,
but it works fine in gpm. There is an older thread somewhere here saying
that new kernels don't support adb mice. How come it works in gpm then? I
don't
Hi,
Out of blue, why is that Linux now runs stable on six (6) different
platforms but commercial software like Star, Corel, Adobe and IBM,
just to mention a few, are only available for ix86? Are there any
political or technical reasons for it?
Sergio
SB == Sergio Brandano [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
SB Out of blue, why is that Linux now runs stable on six (6)
SB different platforms but commercial software like Star,
SB Corel, Adobe and IBM, just to mention a few, are only
SB available for ix86? Are there any political or technical
SB Out of blue, why is that Linux now runs stable on six (6)
SB different platforms but commercial software like Star,
SB Corel, Adobe and IBM, just to mention a few, are only
SB available for ix86? Are there any political or technical
SB reasons for it?
There are some
Sergio Brandano wrote:
Out of blue, why is that Linux now runs stable on six (6) different
platforms but commercial software like Star, Corel, Adobe and IBM,
just to mention a few, are only available for ix86? Are there any
political or technical reasons for it?
heavily biased Because
On Wed, 4 Oct 2000, Sergio Brandano wrote:
Out of blue, why is that Linux now runs stable on six (6) different
Only 6? :-)
platforms but commercial software like Star, Corel, Adobe and IBM,
just to mention a few, are only available for ix86? Are there any
political or technical reasons
Well, don't I need to use the frame buffer or does XFree 4 get around this
problem?
On Wed, 4 Oct 2000, Ethan Benson wrote:
On Wed, Oct 04, 2000 at 01:50:14AM +, Cameron Berkenpas wrote:
I can't seem to create a working 2.4 kernel in debian ppc.
Maybe the problem is that boot X doesn't
Well, don't I need to use the frame buffer or does XFree 4 get around this
problem?
What exactly is the problem? Missing support for a particular frame
buffer in 2.2?
Michael
14 matches
Mail list logo
