[Oy vey, crosspost list from hell -- not sure how to trim...]
On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 09:46:21PM +0100, Gregor Riepl wrote:
> I do think this just reinforces the point that second-class architectures
> should have better, more robust support from the Debian project.
> For example, arch-specific p
Hi Adrian
I do think this just reinforces the point that second-class architectures
should have better, more robust support from the Debian project.
For example, arch-specific packages most decidedly have a place in Debian
(although they should not be the norm). There will always be such packages
Se non visualizzi correttamente questo messaggio, clicca qui:
http://www.mailant.it/nl.aspx?idp=14715&idn=101034&cvp=0E2FA94E582CE1334891A9A307CD9E07B21F6098&idu=6421461&cvup=0941B34515C5AB09B30252F669AD5052BCF824F8
On 11 December 2018 at 7:04PM, Riccardo Mottola wrote:
Hi Christian!
Christian Zigotzky wrote:
Many thanks for ArcticFox! I successfully tested it on my AmigaOne
X1000 today. (64-bit 1.8 GHz dual-core PWRficient PA6T-1682M PowerPC
with AltiVec)
Screenshot of ArcticFox on Fienix (32-bit Debia
Hi Christian!
Christian Zigotzky wrote:
Many thanks for ArcticFox! I successfully tested it on my AmigaOne
X1000 today. (64-bit 1.8 GHz dual-core PWRficient PA6T-1682M PowerPC
with AltiVec)
Screenshot of ArcticFox on Fienix (32-bit Debian based distribution
with a 64-bit kernel):
https://pl
Hello!
On 12/9/18 3:18 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> To me it looks sometimes that Debian is used for testing by upstream, and for
> that the mips architectures don't need to be release architectures.
A note on this: If you decide to move MIPS to Debian Ports, you will make the
port unusable to mos
6 matches
Mail list logo