Re: PPC64: G5 & 4k/64k page size (was: Re: Call for report - G5/PPC970 status)

"Aneesh Kumar K.V" writes: > Romain Dolbeau writes: > >> Le sam. 21 déc. 2019 à 05:31, Aneesh Kumar K.V >> a écrit : >>> I don't have direct access to this system, I have asked if we can get a run >>> with 64K. >> >> OK, thanks! Do you know which model it is? It seems to be working on >> some

Re: git: Please consider demoting git-man to Recommends

On 07.01.20 01:29, Jonathan Nieder wrote: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: On 1/7/20 1:03 AM, Jonathan Nieder wrote: Using Recommends to mean "Depends, except on buildds" would produce bad results for end users that use --no-recommends. I disagree. Anyone who uses "--no-recommends" should

Re: git: Please consider demoting git-man to Recommends

John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > On 1/7/20 1:03 AM, Jonathan Nieder wrote: >> Using Recommends to mean "Depends, except on >> buildds" would produce bad results for end users that use >> --no-recommends. > > I disagree. Anyone who uses "--no-recommends" should know what they are > doing. And

Re: git: Please consider demoting git-man to Recommends

On 1/7/20 1:03 AM, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > This is not what Recommends is for. If we want to remove a dependency > in the buildd environment but not for users, we can use build profiles > for that instead. Build profiles cannot be triggered on buildds. They can be set for manual builds only. >

Re: git: Please consider demoting git-man to Recommends

reassign 948151 git 1:2.25.0~rc1-1 forcemerge 613892 948151 tags 613892 + upstream quit Hi, Anatoly Pugachev wrote: > clone of #613892 ? Indeed it is! Thanks for digging that up. See that bug for details on what is needed to get this done (an upstream patch teaching "git help" to cope with

Re: PPC64: G5 & 4k/64k page size (was: Re: Call for report - G5/PPC970 status)

On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 08:11:47PM +0100, Romain Dolbeau wrote: > Interesting idea (and I have a 6600 aka NV43 in there, indeed) but I > don't think so, as > a) 'nouveau' works in 4.19 with 64 KiB pages > b) using "module_blacklist=nouveau" doesn't help, I just tried > c) my original 'bisect' was

Re: PPC64: G5 & 4k/64k page size (was: Re: Call for report - G5/PPC970 status)

Le lun. 6 janv. 2020 à 19:54, Lennart Sorensen a écrit : > Is it possible this has to do with nouveau and not supporting 64K page > size on older nvidia chips? Interesting idea (and I have a 6600 aka NV43 in there, indeed) but I don't think so, as a) 'nouveau' works in 4.19 with 64 KiB pages b)

Re: PPC64: G5 & 4k/64k page size (was: Re: Call for report - G5/PPC970 status)

On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 07:18:30PM +0100, Romain Dolbeau wrote: > Applied, recompiled with 64 KiB pages, still crashes. > > The backtrace seems more readable this time (and wasn't overwritten by > something else), bad photo here: > Is it

Re: PPC64: G5 & 4k/64k page size (was: Re: Call for report - G5/PPC970 status)

Le dim. 5 janv. 2020 à 16:06, Bertrand Dekoninck a écrit : > I can now test on powermac 7,3 (with an ATI card) > How can I build a deb package of this kernel ? Or is there a package to > download somewhere ? I usually cross-compile on x86-64 from upstream sources. On a Debian Buster with the

Re: PPC64: G5 & 4k/64k page size (was: Re: Call for report - G5/PPC970 status)

Le lun. 6 janv. 2020 à 15:06, Aneesh Kumar K.V a écrit : > Can you try this change. Applied, recompiled with 64 KiB pages, still crashes. The backtrace seems more readable this time (and wasn't overwritten by something else), bad photo here:

Re: PPC64: G5 & 4k/64k page size (was: Re: Call for report - G5/PPC970 status)

Romain Dolbeau writes: > Le sam. 21 déc. 2019 à 05:31, Aneesh Kumar K.V > a écrit : >> I don't have direct access to this system, I have asked if we can get a run >> with 64K. > > OK, thanks! Do you know which model it is? It seems to be working on > some systems, > but we don't have enough