On Sun, Sep 26, 2004 at 02:02:59PM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
Hmmm.. How many of these asm-ppc/foo.h #includes asm-m68k/foo.h (or
#else's them in) does glibc (or really, any non-kernel user) need?
Would someone have the time to try casing all of these inside of #ifdef
__KERNEL__ ? I've finished
of these inside of #ifdef
__KERNEL__ ? I've finished doing similar for SH recently (asm/cpu/ and
asm/mach/ symlinks in this case) and found none of it was really needed.
--
Tom Rini
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
ago, Motorola took down the FTP site which had the
PPC1Bug firmware updates on it. For PPC1Bug, if you have the update
image, all you need to do is dd it into a floppy, and then boot that
floppy in the machine.
--
Tom Rini
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
__inval_enable_L1
+#endif
/* Restore HID0[DPM] to whatever it was before */
sync
mtspr 1008,r8
Are you sure that you can get away with this, passed on how the manuals
(745x) describe the sequence of flush/invalidating the L2 (and, L3) ?
--
Tom Rini
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
, and I disavow any knowledge of
typing the above.
--
Tom Rini
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
defines __powerpc__ :)
--
Tom Rini
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 05:26:01PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 09:10:42AM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
Also, the todc code knows about many RTC chips, among them, the MC146818
seems to be the one used by the rtc.h stuff, and seems to be a generic
legacy RTC chip
On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 02:45:04PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 09:28:00AM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 12:40:50PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 10:06:20AM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 05:56:08PM +0100
On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 05:48:22PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 09:33:15AM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 05:26:01PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 09:10:42AM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
Also, the todc code knows about many RTC chips
On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 12:40:50PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 10:06:20AM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 05:56:08PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 09:47:40AM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
4) Use CONFIG_GEN_RTC and be happy. What
_think_ alarm is the only
important one, aside from /proc bits maybe) to genrtc. :)
--
Tom Rini
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 05:56:08PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 09:47:40AM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
4) Use CONFIG_GEN_RTC and be happy. What _might_ be happening right now
is that chrp_get_rtc_time is 'funky' and not quite right for anything
other than an IBM
for anything
other than an IBM OpenFirmeware'd CHRP box. What I would suggest is
looking at include/asm-generic/rtc.h in 2.6 and moving much of that code
into 'chrp_get_rtc_time' and 'chrp_set_rtc_time'.
--
Tom Rini
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
of the CONFIG_RTC there is some mention of this option being
needed for using the RTC clock in a SMP compatible fashion.
Hrm... that SMP thingy is weird.
IIRC, the SMP thing is an old (and not quite accurate now) i386'ism.
--
Tom Rini
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 06:10:52PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 10:06:20AM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 05:56:08PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 09:47:40AM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
4) Use CONFIG_GEN_RTC and be happy. What
-specific issues) ?
--
Tom Rini
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 07:36:57AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 12:45:47PM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 09:31:46PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 11:10:21AM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 11:29:38AM +0200, Sven
piggyback i was told)
which is able to add a initrd onto an existing kernel.
As the images used, prior to additional tools being run on them (such as
mkprep) use an ldscript to determine locations, this might be possible.
--
Tom Rini
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 09:31:46PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 11:10:21AM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 11:29:38AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Hello,
In order to continue work on making debian-installer subarch friendly, i
now launch a second
know who takes care of those mirrors
CC'ing Tom Rini, hoping he knows something.
AFAIK, all of the mirrors are OK. What ones aren't?
--
Tom Rini
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
, and if this fails stop
bk pull -t -q /dev/null 21 || exit 0
# Just in case bk craps out on us...
bk resolve -a -q -t /dev/null 21
--
Tom Rini
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 02:54:50PM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
No. I don't really know who takes care of those mirrors
CC'ing Tom Rini, hoping he knows something.
AFAIK, all of the mirrors are OK. What ones aren't?
linuxppc-2.5-benh is stuck at -test2.
Bah. And right now I
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 06:09:11AM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 02:54:50PM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
No. I don't really know who takes care of those mirrors
CC'ing Tom Rini, hoping he knows something.
AFAIK, all of the mirrors are OK. What ones aren't
MacRISC3 Power Macintosh
board revision : 0001
detected as : 287 (PowerBook G4 12)
pmac flags : 000a
L2 cache: 256K unified
memory : 640MB
pmac-generation : NewWorld
TAU is not supported on 745x, per errata documents.
--
Tom Rini
http://gate.crashing.org
XFree 3.6 on this Box?
I don't _believe_ that S3/XFree worked on PPC ever. What I would
suggest is that you pick up a PCI-based Matrox Millenium 1 (_some_
versions of PPCBUG support this, I believe), run a framebuffer on that,
and run an Xserver over that.
--
Tom Rini
http://gate.crashing.org
' is meaningful. My guess is that
mplayer makes incorrect assumptions when trying to set this (and use the
RTC_PIE_{ON,OFF} sysctls), and thus there is a bug in mplayer.
--
Tom Rini
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 07:14:37AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 03:03:58PM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
On Mon, May 26, 2003 at 10:21:32PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Mon, May 26, 2003 at 09:06:24PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Hello,
I am working on isolating
tags only go back as far as 2.4.19, and possibly only 2.4.20.
Adding back-tags is on my todo list, but not very high.
What you'll want to do is 'bk changes -e' and look for when v2.4.18-pre3
was merged into linuxppc_2_4, and then when that was merged into
linuxppc_2_4_devel
--
Tom Rini
http
.
It works for me on a TiPB III with an 'M6 LW'
--
Tom Rini
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
about eth0? Does the new kernel say anything about
eth0? (look at dmesg, man dmesg).
--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
On Sat, Nov 09, 2002 at 10:00:17PM +0100, David Ulrich wrote:
I compiled my kernel 2.4.18 with enhanced real time clock. It's on a
PowerPC 604e, PowerMac 9500MP bi 180MHz.
CONFIG_RTC or CONFIG_PPC_RTC? CONFIG_RTC is not what you want,
CONFIG_PPC_RTC is.
--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http
in between too? On my TiBook (RevIII? The
800Mhz one..) it does 800Mhz or 667Mhz and nothing in between. So the
above would set mine to 800Mhz.
--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
compile ide-cd support into the kernel or as a module?
If it's a module, you don't need to do anything on the command line,
just set up /etc/modutils/aliases to have:
alias scsi_hostadapter ide-scsi
And then just use /dev/sr0 as you would for a 'real' SCSI cd drive.
--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http
On Wed, Aug 07, 2002 at 05:28:55PM +0200, Jesus Climent wrote:
On Wed, Aug 07, 2002 at 08:18:33AM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
On Wed, Aug 07, 2002 at 12:40:57PM +0200, Jesus Climent wrote:
After upgrading to 2.4.19-ben0 I am having the following problem:
Kernel command line: root=/dev
On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 03:26:37PM +0200, Olaf Hering wrote:
begin On Wed, Jul 03, Tom Rini wrote:
On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 09:02:32PM +0200, Olaf Hering wrote:
On Mon, Jul 01, Tom Rini wrote:
Lemme know if you still have the correct ammount of memory reported
still. Thanks
v1.3 (c) 1996-2001 SuSE GmbH
[snip]
--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 04:58:17PM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 09:02:32PM +0200, Olaf Hering wrote:
On Mon, Jul 01, Tom Rini wrote:
Lemme know if you still have the correct ammount of memory reported
still. Thanks.
ocan you provide a new patch for _devel? I
, but tests on other PRePs would be good too.
The main point of this patch is that we don't rely on residual data to
find out how much memory we have, and thus all memory is reported
correctly when netbooted.
--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
= arch/ppc/boot/prep/Makefile
On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 09:02:32PM +0200, Olaf Hering wrote:
On Mon, Jul 01, Tom Rini wrote:
Lemme know if you still have the correct ammount of memory reported
still. Thanks.
ocan you provide a new patch for _devel? I used that one and it doesnt
compile
D'oh. I forgot to add asm
an 'optimized' kernel-image? Are you
desperate for a few more k of RAM?
Unless there's some missing driver in the provided kernel image, you
won't gain much by compiling your own custom kernel.
--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
with the
swim3 code which has since been fixed and I believe 2.4.19 will work
correctly in that case.
--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 12:34:45AM +0200, Roland Wegmann wrote:
On Sunday 30 June 2002 17:19, Tom Rini wrote:
On Sun, Jun 30, 2002 at 07:10:56PM +0200, Roland Wegmann wrote:
Has anyone compiled an optimized kernel-image (version 2.4.18) for an
iMac 500MHz (early 2001)? If so, could you
that debian porters have increased the match number as there
have been some changes since 2.95.3. Shouldn't it really be called
something like 2.95.3-1, -2, -3, etc ???
IIRC, CVS version of gcc-2.95 is at .4, which may or may not ever be
released. But it has fixes over .3.
--
Tom Rini (TR1265
that it is..)
--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
on 2.2.x for PPC is at best
not supported, and will probably crash your box if you get it to
compile. If you want drm, use 2.4
--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
, or is there some way to make it work?
Checking back on this bug... This code still appears to be there. Have
you talked to Ben about this?
No. I wrote to linuxppc-dev way back in December 10-13, thread Why
require CONFIG_BOOTX_TEXT for so much of offb?, and Tom Rini and Peter
Bergner seemed
-tpatch from your old repo, and bk import -tpatch ../patch . to
your new repo.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
On Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 10:02:01PM -0700, Erik Andersen wrote:
On Sun Jan 06, 2002 at 01:54:12PM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
On Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 02:15:11PM -0500, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
Colin Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What annoys me about bootprep.sh is that it builds a kernel
w/o a floppy drive? And at least mine needs its
own floppy drive..
--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 06:05:32PM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 01:42:43AM +0100, christian mock wrote:
On Sun, 2002-01-06 at 14:15, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
Well, the only reason I could see is if it either needs a kernel
config option enabled, not provided
someone post that? I'm sort-of curious what needs to be done
'special' for a prep box..
--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
would probably work with all of the other cards?
--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
as a build
problem with strace in the BTS. I guess that's just a limitation of the
system. FWIW, that fix whatever it was doesn't seem to be in benh's tree.
Are you sure? I just checked 2.4.14 and it has the proper fix to
asm-ppc/atomic.h
--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
on CONFIG_ALL_PPC, and removed USE_NV_MODES (which
shouldn't be needed now). However, I have none of this hardware, and I
remember some of these drivers being very touchy. So could people with
this hardware apply the patch and let me know if it works still?
Maintainers, does this look right?
--
Tom
doesn't care about OF after early boot init,
right?
My (admitiedly wierd/wild idea) is that it's not that OF is still doing
something, but that OF opened something on the disk when it was still
alive, and we left the HW in a bad state.
--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
On Sun, Nov 11, 2001 at 09:09:24PM -0800, Laurent de Segur wrote:
I wrote a little test case that reproduces this kernel panic most of the
time. the code doesn't need to write. Just read the partition map, sync +
reread it again = crash :-( Very basic.
Can you post this?
--
Tom Rini (TR1265
stuff for a while now which is why I sort-of
discount the partition table stuff myself. But I really want to see the
testcase someone said they wrote, it'll make life easier in tracking
this down :)
--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
and decode
the oops? Looking in 2.4.15-pre2 I don't see the mac partition table
stuffs not doing something the msdos ones do..
--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
and devfs in use. Does anyone else see this
same behavior? Also is this a Powermac specific issue
or does it happen on intel as well? This is on the
linux 2.4.xx kernels.
It's because ide-floppy doesn't do devfs.
--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
On Sun, Nov 11, 2001 at 05:12:56PM -0900, Ethan Benson wrote:
On Sun, Nov 11, 2001 at 09:37:26AM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
So what happens exactly? Can you reproduce this on something and decode
the oops? Looking in 2.4.15-pre2 I don't see the mac partition table
stuffs not doing
CONFIG_PPC_RTC=y and CONFIG_RTC=n ?
--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 09:16:33PM -0500, Shawn D'Alimonte wrote:
On November 8, 2001 07:32 pm, Tom Rini wrote:
On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 06:12:55PM -0500, Shawn D'Alimonte wrote:
I did that on my PReP machine and now it locks up tryign to set the
hardware clock. Since I use NTP to set
'ed' need to be declared as a Build-Dep for anything which
needs it to build? From what I can tell it's not on the build-essential
lists, so it would have to be listed. Right?
--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
On Sat, Nov 03, 2001 at 09:42:11PM -0700, Chris Tillman wrote:
On Sat, Nov 03, 2001 at 01:32:15PM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
Anyhow, 'MPC 8xx' isn't
prep, it's 8xx, and is a CPU identifier. Just like MPC 7xx, 7xx, 6xx
and 7xxx (Motorola's official way of saying 74xx). Debian doesn't
of saying 74xx). Debian doesn't
currently (or hasn't been tested, and probably has subtle problems due
to cache and msoft-float stuff) support 8xx.
--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
the
next stable release after woody, in 2043.
Perhaps we should suck down the list penguinppc.org has at the time
woody goes frozen. 2.2.20-pre12 should be working on everything listed
there.
--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
in a
while..
--
G. Branden Robinson| Why do we have to hide from the
Debian GNU/Linux | police, Daddy?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Because we use vi, son. They use
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | emacs.
--
Tom Rini
updated a box of mine remotely from ext2 to
ext3 w/o a hitch.
Tho if you don't mind the reinstall and can backup, XFS does sound like
A Good Thing.
--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
to be changed every few months, in this example anyhow.
It might be easier to list known _not_ working machines. Possibly also
pointing to http://penguinppc.org/projects/hw/
--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
-to-date
information about what works in Linux. And if it works with Linux
at that point, it should work with debian (if it's new new hw).
--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
set a date on the box from PPCBUG to start with? hwclock is
quite happy on mine, and PRePs don't have ADB anyhow so the evil clock
hack program can't do anything.
--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 11:20:17AM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
Tom Rini [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is this a PReP box you're talking about? What kernel are you running
and did you set a date on the box from PPCBUG to start with? hwclock is
quite happy on mine, and PRePs don't have ADB
On Tue, Oct 23, 2001 at 11:18:39PM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
On Tue, Oct 23, 2001 at 08:33:24PM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
On Tue, Oct 23, 2001 at 08:41:45PM -0600, Derrik Pates wrote:
Has anyone considered patching the kernel config scripts so that it just
won't even ASK about
values has
CONFIG_RTC=n and CONFIG_PPC_RTC=y.
--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
.
--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
the iBook have enough VRAM to do DRI on even 640x480 at 16bpp?
--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 02:07:11PM -0700, Nicolas Lopez wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 12:46:18PM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 12:25:09PM -0700, Nicolas Lopez wrote:
But does the iBook have enough VRAM to do DRI on even 640x480 at 16bpp?
Um, yeah. [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 08:54:01PM -0600, Derrik Pates wrote:
On Thu, 18 Oct 2001, Tom Rini wrote:
But does the iBook have enough VRAM to do DRI on even 640x480 at 16bpp?
My FireWire iBook has 8 MB of 128-bit SDR SGRAM. The display on the
clamshell iBooks only does 800x600, and the iBook2
_may_ work, but I'm not sure if the
framebuffer driver can init them from scratch. And try 2.4 before 2.2
as well since I believe the 2.4 one is newer...
--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
assume the same will be true for i386.
Downgrading fixed galeon on i386/sid for me. So there is hope this will be
seen as an important bug and fixed. :)
--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
help me out here?
Either update your system, or if running potato (iirc, it's _not_ 2.4 happy
anyways) steal the new kernel-package.
--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
support for booting compressed images (ie, zImage).
As in objcopy ... gzip -9 or the 'zImage' target? They aren't exactly
the same..
--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
On Fri, Sep 21, 2001 at 01:29:04PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Sep 21, 2001 at 11:20:47AM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
On Fri, Sep 21, 2001 at 11:49:51AM -0500, Peter Bergner wrote:
Just a little nit, but some people might be interested, as part
of the Various ppc64 chrp
had issues this afternoon (-0700).
Is it still not working?
--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
On Fri, Sep 07, 2001 at 09:55:49PM -0500, Kevin van Haaren wrote:
I just tried penguinppc.org and got a page back. Is it ok to start
rsync'ing kernels and such, or should we wait a bit?
WWW is up, rsync is not. There should be a story up soon explaining
whats going on.
--
Tom Rini (TR1265
and 2.4.9 on my G4. The 2.2 version should
also be safe. BUT, ext3-0.9.5 and below aren't, on 2.4.
--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
On Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 03:47:28PM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
yaboot only supports ext2, 1.2.3 allegedly supports reiser.
And, iirc, this should also make it easier to add in support for other
filesystems as well. Not that I've looked at it recently..
--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http
it:
/etc/modutils/aliases:
alias ethX airport
post-install airport iwconfig ethX params
Then update-modules.
--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
check /var/log/messages and /var/log/kern.log? It sounds like
when you woke the machine up the fs was 'bad' and got mounted read-only.
When you booted up again did it fsck?
--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
On Sat, Aug 11, 2001 at 12:12:34PM -0700, Wilhelm Fitzpatrick wrote:
On Sat, 11 Aug 2001, Tom Rini wrote:
On Sat, Aug 11, 2001 at 11:43:16AM -0700, Wilhelm Fitzpatrick wrote:
I experience a weird symptom the other day. After waking up my TiBook
from sleep (running 2.4.8pre4-ben0) I
for
some reason). On x86 the 'lowmem' limit is ~960MB.
--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
to the device your cdrom is at.
sr0 on scsi systems, hdb, hdc or hdd depending on machine if it's IDE.
--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
Just to let people know, the airport driver in BenH's current rsync puts
the airport card to sleep and wakes it up, so there's no need to rmmod
it anymore. Hopefully it'll end up in Linus' tree sometime soon.
--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
...
I don't see a problem there.
Well then, I don't think it's a problem at all then. APUS need the same thing
quik/yaboot does. I'm _assuming_ it's stripped for space only. So I'm
probably wrong there tho :)
--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 02:50:05PM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote:
On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 03:13:39PM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 01:14:42PM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
coff images are still useful for booting oldworlds no?
Yes, but they just aren't 'zImage.pmac'. I
On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 12:07:06AM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
On Tue, Jun 26, 2001 at 06:39:44PM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 01:32:54AM +, Michael Blakeley wrote:
...which I guess is ok, since the build proceeded anyway. But after
building the kernel it stopped
the built-in
display.
--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
questions about the status of hardware support.
Power Mgt -- Are the power management functions (sleep, charging,
backlight control, etc.) supported?
It seems to be with the 2.4.4-b3 sources I got from a YDL developer.
Yes, Dan took some of the nice things out of BenH's tree. :)
--
Tom Rini
On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 03:13:39PM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 01:14:42PM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
coff images are still useful for booting oldworlds no?
Yes, but they just aren't 'zImage.pmac'. I couldn't decide
which of the 3 to point to.
is there a better
On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 03:34:49PM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 04:18:53PM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
Er. 'zImage' makes an OF-bootable image for NewWorld, OldWorld and miboot.
The 'zImage.pmac' link points to the NewWorld because there's people out
there who don't use
1 - 100 of 212 matches
Mail list logo
