On Fri, Oct 03, 2014 at 01:00:04AM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
On Fri, Oct 03, 2014 at 12:33:01AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Hi Steve,
On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 10:02:34AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 10:47:10PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
The tarball should be
Hi Steve,
On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 10:02:34AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 10:47:10PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
The tarball should be decompressed in the root of the CD-ROM, while the
kernel and initrd should be placed in the /install directory. The ISO
image
On Fri, Oct 03, 2014 at 12:33:01AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Hi Steve,
On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 10:02:34AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 10:47:10PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
The tarball should be decompressed in the root of the CD-ROM, while the
kernel and initrd
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 10:47:10PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 02:09:29PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 09:57:44AM -0300, Mauricio Faria de Oliveira wrote:
On 09/22/2014 12:00 AM, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 06:19:43PM
I was thinking why not add the KVM PPC support to into the debian PPC distro
Christian Xeno74 was succes have it working on X1000 Semi 64 dual core.
will be wonderful have it simple installed for G4 and G5 machine too
Luigi
On 22/09/14 15:24, Konstantinos Margaritis wrote:
On Mon, 22 Sep 2014
On 09/22/2014 12:00 AM, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 06:19:43PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
I'm adding support for new architectures at the moment. powerpc is one
of the most awkward existing arches to add boot support for at the
moment, due to the mess of older machines.
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 09:57:44AM -0300, Mauricio Faria de Oliveira wrote:
On 09/22/2014 12:00 AM, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 06:19:43PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
I'm adding support for new architectures at the moment. powerpc is one
of the most awkward existing arches to
On Mon, 22 Sep 2014 09:57:44 -0300
Mauricio Faria de Oliveira mauri...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
Yes, ppc64el runs on POWER8 onwards with OpenFirmware based firmware.
I thought the base was Power7? At least my qemu-based ppc64le VM
declares itself as a Power7?
Konstantinos
--
To
On 09/22/2014 10:24 AM, Konstantinos Margaritis wrote:
On Mon, 22 Sep 2014 09:57:44 -0300
Mauricio Faria de Oliveira mauri...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
Yes, ppc64el runs on POWER8 onwards with OpenFirmware based firmware.
I thought the base was Power7? At least my qemu-based ppc64le VM
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 02:09:29PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 09:57:44AM -0300, Mauricio Faria de Oliveira wrote:
On 09/22/2014 12:00 AM, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 06:19:43PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
I'm adding support for new architectures
Hi folks,
I'm adding support for new architectures at the moment. powerpc is one
of the most awkward existing arches to add boot support for at the
moment, due to the mess of older machines. I'm hoping that ppc64el is
better, but I don't have much information to go on. What should we be
doing to
On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 06:19:43PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
I'm adding support for new architectures at the moment. powerpc is one
of the most awkward existing arches to add boot support for at the
moment, due to the mess of older machines. I'm hoping that ppc64el is
better, but I don't
12 matches
Mail list logo
