Hi,
Adam Conrad wrote (23 Mar 2014 20:03:12 GMT) :
Not fixing a bug isn't the way to get rid of it.
I agree. My wording was not appropriate, and I'm sorry for the bad
feelings I may have caused.
Hoping to clarify a bit:
1. I'll try to go on playing the intermediate between the relevant
Hi,
Lennart Sorensen wrote (22 Mar 2014 12:31:00 GMT) :
Patch works for powerpc and someone else already reported it working
for powerpcspe.
Adam Conrad wrote (22 Mar 2014 16:20:23 GMT) :
Works fine for me on powerpc,
Thanks a lot for testing!
I've uploaded libglib-object-introspection-perl
Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 11:53:23AM +0100, intrigeri wrote:
intrigeri wrote (20 Jan 2014 17:58:03 GMT) :
https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=89552
Sure. Debian porters, I'll let you subscribe to the RT ticket, and
hopefully take care of this porting problem.
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 10:33:32AM +0100, intrigeri wrote:
I'd rather not drop s390x from the list of architectures this package
is built for, but this RC bug has now been around for 6 months, and at
some point I'll want to get rid of it.
Not fixing a bug isn't the way to get rid of it.
Hi,
intrigeri wrote (20 Jan 2014 17:58:03 GMT) :
https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=89552
Sure. Debian porters, I'll let you subscribe to the RT ticket, and
hopefully take care of this porting problem.
I'd like to see this RC bug fixed eventually, and I still hope this
can be done
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 11:53:23AM +0100, intrigeri wrote:
intrigeri wrote (20 Jan 2014 17:58:03 GMT) :
https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=89552
Sure. Debian porters, I'll let you subscribe to the RT ticket, and
hopefully take care of this porting problem.
I'd like to see this RC
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 11:53:23AM +0100, intrigeri wrote:
AFAICT the latest patch proposed by upstream on February 9 [1] has
been tested on mips only. My understanding is that upstream has been
waiting for more test results since then. Can anyone please test this
on other big-endian
7 matches
Mail list logo
