On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 08:56:56PM -0400, Albert Cahalan wrote:
On 5/29/07, Paul Mackerras [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Albert Cahalan writes:
Running a 32-bit userspace on a 64-bit kernel is
however gross, foul, bad, nasty, and wrong.
Rubbish. It makes a lot of sense for most userspace
On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 11:33:38PM -0400, Albert Cahalan wrote:
On 5/28/07, Charles Plessy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le Mon, May 28, 2007 at 07:52:42PM -0400, Albert Cahalan a écrit :
1. you actually ARE cross compiling
2. you didn't tell the package that (via make arguments, etc.)
Hi,
Albert Cahalan writes:
Running a 32-bit userspace on a 64-bit kernel is
however gross, foul, bad, nasty, and wrong.
Rubbish. It makes a lot of sense for most userspace programs to be
32-bit on a 64-bit PowerPC system. Unless a program needs to do
64-bit integer arithmetic or access more than
On 5/29/07, Paul Mackerras [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Albert Cahalan writes:
Running a 32-bit userspace on a 64-bit kernel is
however gross, foul, bad, nasty, and wrong.
Rubbish. It makes a lot of sense for most userspace programs to be
32-bit on a 64-bit PowerPC system. Unless a program
Hi all, hi Sven,
Le Sun, May 20, 2007 at 12:27:12PM +0200, Sven Luther a écrit :
These .configure thingies, are they using the gnu autoconf stuff, and if
so which version. Or some hand-made ./configure script ?
I do not know... À vrai dire, my motivation to investigate further
decreased
On 5/20/07, Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, May 19, 2007 at 04:46:04PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
Out of the 140 packages using ./configure, 30 used ppc64, but only one
faild to build for this reason.
These .configure thingies, are they using the gnu autoconf stuff, and if
Le Mon, May 28, 2007 at 07:52:42PM -0400, Albert Cahalan a écrit :
1. you actually ARE cross compiling
2. you didn't tell the package that (via make arguments, etc.)
Hi,
does it mean that there is something broken in the concept of a Debian
port? When I install a Debian Etch for powerpc on
On 5/28/07, Charles Plessy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le Mon, May 28, 2007 at 07:52:42PM -0400, Albert Cahalan a écrit :
1. you actually ARE cross compiling
2. you didn't tell the package that (via make arguments, etc.)
Hi,
does it mean that there is something broken in the concept of a
On 5/20/07, Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, May 19, 2007 at 04:46:04PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
Out of the 140 packages using ./configure, 30 used ppc64, but only one
faild to build for this reason.
These .configure thingies, are they using the gnu autoconf stuff, and if
On Sat, May 19, 2007 at 04:46:04PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
Le Fri, May 18, 2007 at 07:37:07AM +0200, Sven Luther a écrit :
Do you know what exactly is causing this problem ? Or could you list the
140 packages which you already detected to be problematic ?
Hi Sven,
Out of the
Le Fri, May 18, 2007 at 07:26:06PM +1000, jim a écrit :
sorry in advance if i have missed the point - but this might be relevant ;)
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=251149
Thanks all for your answers, it seems that linux32 is the solution.
However, I remain puzzled by the fact
Le Fri, May 18, 2007 at 07:37:07AM +0200, Sven Luther a écrit :
Do you know what exactly is causing this problem ? Or could you list the
140 packages which you already detected to be problematic ?
Hi Sven,
Out of the 140 packages using ./configure, 30 used ppc64, but only one
faild to build
Charles Plessy wrote:
Dear all,
Starting from the observation that a pre-release debian pacakge of
root-system and the current xaralx (non-free) pacakge fail to build
from source on G5 powerpc machines but not on G4, I started to get
worried that that kind of failures would be more widespread.
Charles Plessy a écrit :
Dear all,
Starting from the observation that a pre-release debian pacakge of
root-system and the current xaralx (non-free) pacakge fail to build
from source on G5 powerpc machines but not on G4, I started to get
worried that that kind of failures would be more
Dear all,
Starting from the observation that a pre-release debian pacakge of
root-system and the current xaralx (non-free) pacakge fail to build
from source on G5 powerpc machines but not on G4, I started to get
worried that that kind of failures would be more widespread.
The core of the problem
On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 12:13:34PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
Dear all,
Starting from the observation that a pre-release debian pacakge of
root-system and the current xaralx (non-free) pacakge fail to build
from source on G5 powerpc machines but not on G4, I started to get
worried that
16 matches
Mail list logo
