On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 04:52:04PM -0300, Breno Leitao wrote:
Right. This is going to help all those shared-library-issue bugs to be
'solved'.
Btw, did you mark all the failed/build-attempted to rebuild, so, we can find
what
packages are going to benefit from it?
Yes, I requeued all the
On 09/12/2014 05:58 AM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 04:52:04PM -0300, Breno Leitao wrote:
Right. This is going to help all those shared-library-issue bugs to be
'solved'.
Btw, did you mark all the failed/build-attempted to rebuild, so, we can find
what
packages are going
Hi,
status update, we have these 4 left:
* Aurelien Jarno (aure...@debian.org) [140908 14:20]:
bzr#760054 ftbfs (non ppc64el specific) #760054
I'm not sure if we still need bzr on new systems.
emacs23#749530 build-dep on libotf, which ftbfs (libtool)
build-depends on
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 01:02:52PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
Hi,
status update, we have these 4 left:
* Aurelien Jarno (aure...@debian.org) [140908 14:20]:
bzr#760054 ftbfs (non ppc64el specific) #760054
I'm not sure if we still need bzr on new systems.
You're kidding, surely?
On Thu, 11 Sep 2014, Steve McIntyre wrote:
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 01:02:52PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
Hi,
status update, we have these 4 left:
* Aurelien Jarno (aure...@debian.org) [140908 14:20]:
bzr#760054 ftbfs (non ppc64el specific) #760054
I'm not sure if we
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 02:13:43PM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote:
On Thu, 11 Sep 2014, Steve McIntyre wrote:
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 01:02:52PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
Hi,
status update, we have these 4 left:
* Aurelien Jarno (aure...@debian.org) [140908 14:20]:
bzr
Hi all,
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 03:55:49PM +0200, Frédéric Bonnard wrote:
Hi all/Aurelien,
I'd like to help fixing issues found during buildd of packages on ppc64el :
https://buildd.debian.org/status/architecture.php?a=ppc64elsuite=sid
I have just found that the autoreconf/libtool issue has
On 09/11/2014 12:03 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
[snip] I think ld would refuse to link ppc64 BE and
LE objects together.
Yes, you're right:
$ echo 'int main() { return 0; }' test.c
$ gcc -c test.c -o el.o -mlittle-endian
$ gcc -c test.c -o eb.o -mbig-endian
$
Hi Aurelien,
On 09/11/2014 12:03 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
So powerpc64le-linux-gnu is wrongly detected as elf64ppc (instead of
elf64lppc). This value is then passed to ld to check if it supports
shared libraries. The above binutils change make this check to succeed.
This value is not used
The next major offender seems to be cmake and I am confused about it. [...]
cmake depends on missing:
- cmake-data (= 2.8.12.2-1+b1)
That's #760823 (the = means a dependency on a particular version, in
this case one that never existed), which has already been fixed.
The particular case of
* Aurelien Jarno (aure...@debian.org) [140908 14:20]:
bacula #758125 ftbfs (libtool)
deborphan #735010 ftbfs (libtool)
subversion #727295 build-dep indirectly on exiv2, which ftbfs (libtool)
fixed / installed.
git#727295 build-dep indirectly on exiv2, which
* Andreas Barth (a...@ayous.org) [140908 14:23]:
git#727295 build-dep indirectly on exiv2, which ftbfs (libtool)
now FTBFS on it's own in the testsuite, test-build on amd64 for
comparison running, bug report will follow.
Still works on amd64, ppc64el specific.
Bug #760844
hi,
On 09/08/2014 09:37 AM, Andreas Barth wrote:
mutt #752831 build-dep on gpgme1.0 which ftbfs (libtool)
Also fixed.
The next major offender seems to be cmake and I am confused about it. For
example,
a lot of packages doesn-t build because depends on cmake-data, as the package
* Andreas Barth (a...@ayous.org) [140908 14:23]:
* Aurelien Jarno (aure...@debian.org) [140908 14:20]:
emacs23#749530 build-dep on libotf, which ftbfs (libtool)
build-depends on libtiff-dev which isn't in the archive anymore (at
least not for new architectures). #735998
Andi
--
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 01:53:01PM +0200, Erwan Prioul wrote:
On 08/21/2014 04:26 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
I have started to put the known failures with a bug number, but if some
others can help with matching a build failure with a bug number that
would be great. Of course if there is
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 04:26:55PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 03:55:49PM +0200, Frédéric Bonnard wrote:
I'd like to help fixing issues found during buildd of packages on ppc64el :
https://buildd.debian.org/status/architecture.php?a=ppc64elsuite=sid
Thanks,
Hi Aurelien,
On 09/05/2014 02:33 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Now that we have debian-installer working, I have installed a VM with
it and tried to determine which packages are still missing to setup a
[...]
Thanks for the effort and the comprehensive list.
klibc #749060 some
On 08/21/2014 04:26 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
I have started to put the known failures with a bug number, but if some
others can help with matching a build failure with a bug number that
would be great. Of course if there is no bug in the BTS, it's a good
idea to debug it and report a new bug
Hi Aurelien,
A few more failing-packages - bugs:
cernlib #720689 (patch; non ppc64el-specific)
kbuild #759457
libgssglue #732574 (patch)
linux-tools #754213 #747151
mosjz #752415 (patch)
mpich2 #744634
ruby-ffi #759550 (pending)
Thanks!
--
Mauricio Faria de
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 12:49:30PM -0300, Mauricio Faria de Oliveira wrote:
Hi Aurelien,
A few more failing-packages - bugs:
cernlib #720689 (patch; non ppc64el-specific)
kbuild #759457
libgssglue #732574 (patch)
linux-tools #754213 #747151
mosjz #752415 (patch)
Aurelien,
On 08/26/2014 12:51 AM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 04:12:01PM -0300, Breno Leitao wrote:
This is a list of the packages that I just mapped to bugs.
Thanks I have imported it.
python-apt #755342 (serious; not ppc64el-specific; patch available)
--
Mauricio Faria
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 05:51:20AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 04:12:01PM -0300, Breno Leitao wrote:
Aurelien,
This is a list of the packages that I just mapped to bugs.
Thanks I have imported it.
On a slightly related thing, it seems we will need
Hi Aurelien,
On 08/26/2014 12:51 AM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 04:12:01PM -0300, Breno Leitao wrote:
Aurelien,
This is a list of the packages that I just mapped to bugs.
Thanks I have imported it.
On a slightly related thing, it seems we will need webkitgtk soon,
On 08/26/2014 12:44 PM, Breno Leitao wrote:
Right, Mauricio is working on it and should send the patch soon.
Aurelien fixed/submitted it, and an upload to the archive was made
(#759313).
--
Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
IBM Linux Technology Center
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Aurelien,
This is a list of the packages that I just mapped to bugs.
On 08/24/2014 07:04 PM, Breno Leitao wrote:
libg15 - 758539
xfsprogs - 757455
libnfo - 718062
opencore-amr - 755830
libverto - 757953
libranlip - 758031
regina-rexx - 756354
libsigc++-1.2 - 751371
dircproxy - 745154
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 04:12:01PM -0300, Breno Leitao wrote:
Aurelien,
This is a list of the packages that I just mapped to bugs.
Thanks I have imported it.
On a slightly related thing, it seems we will need webkitgtk soon,
and unfortunately I haven't been able to find a patch for it.
Hi Aurelien,
On 08/21/2014 11:26 AM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 03:55:49PM +0200, Frédéric Bonnard wrote:
Hi all/Aurelien,
Hi,
I'd like to help fixing issues found during buildd of packages on ppc64el :
Hi all/Aurelien,
I'd like to help fixing issues found during buildd of packages on ppc64el :
https://buildd.debian.org/status/architecture.php?a=ppc64elsuite=sid
How should I proceed to setup a similar schroot with same package repo?
At the moment we have a buildd daemon at IBM and I can do that
On 08/21/2014 10:55 AM, Frédéric Bonnard wrote:
How should I proceed to setup a similar schroot with same package repo?
The packages are on debian.org too! ;-D
One can debootstrap/sbuild-create-chroot from there.. e.g.,
debootstrap --variant=buildd sid sid.ppc64el
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 03:55:49PM +0200, Frédéric Bonnard wrote:
Hi all/Aurelien,
Hi,
I'd like to help fixing issues found during buildd of packages on ppc64el :
https://buildd.debian.org/status/architecture.php?a=ppc64elsuite=sid
Thanks, help is welcomed. You might have seen there are two
30 matches
Mail list logo
