On Sun, 2003-12-07 at 21:51, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Sun, 7 Dec 2003, Aaron Schrab wrote:
At 21:36 +0100 07 Dec 2003, Geert Uytterhoeven [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 7 Dec 2003, Aaron Schrab wrote:
At 11:34 +0100 07 Dec 2003, Geert Uytterhoeven [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Fri, 2003-12-05 at 14:40, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Thu, 2003-12-04 at 23:38, Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
On Thu, 2003-12-04 at 18:46, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Wed, 2003-12-03 at 07:30, Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
[...]
I think I know what you mean now; scrolling or deleting lines in vim is
On Sun, 7 Dec 2003, Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
On Fri, 2003-12-05 at 14:40, Michel Dänzer wrote:
Out of curiosity, did you try gnome-terminal with an anti-aliased font?
That would be expected to be slower.
No, as there is no obvious way to use a non anti-aliased fonts just for
the
At 11:34 +0100 07 Dec 2003, Geert Uytterhoeven [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another annoying thing is that gnome-terminal is no longer able to display the
`high' characters from 8-bit ASCII (ISO-8859-{1,15}), nor can I type them ;-(
Works fine for me as long as I've selected the correct entry from
On Sun, 7 Dec 2003, Aaron Schrab wrote:
At 11:34 +0100 07 Dec 2003, Geert Uytterhoeven [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another annoying thing is that gnome-terminal is no longer able to display
the
`high' characters from 8-bit ASCII (ISO-8859-{1,15}), nor can I type them
;-(
Works fine for
On Sun, 7 Dec 2003, Aaron Schrab wrote:
At 21:36 +0100 07 Dec 2003, Geert Uytterhoeven [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 7 Dec 2003, Aaron Schrab wrote:
At 11:34 +0100 07 Dec 2003, Geert Uytterhoeven [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another annoying thing is that gnome-terminal is no longer able
At 21:36 +0100 07 Dec 2003, Geert Uytterhoeven [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 7 Dec 2003, Aaron Schrab wrote:
At 11:34 +0100 07 Dec 2003, Geert Uytterhoeven [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another annoying thing is that gnome-terminal is no longer able to
display the
`high' characters from
On Thu, 2003-12-04 at 23:38, Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
On Thu, 2003-12-04 at 18:46, Michel Dnzer wrote:
On Wed, 2003-12-03 at 07:30, Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
[...] I find that it might be some scheduling problem and not the
radeonfb:
When I start find /home for the first time
On Wed, 2003-12-03 at 07:30, Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
[...] I find that it might be some scheduling problem and not the
radeonfb:
When I start find /home for the first time it scrolls slowly. When I do
it a second time it is still slow. But when I did it a third time it is
superb fast
On Thu, 2003-12-04 at 18:46, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Wed, 2003-12-03 at 07:30, Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
[...] I find that it might be some scheduling problem and not the
radeonfb:
When I start find /home for the first time it scrolls slowly. When I do
it a second time it is still
On Wed, 2003-12-03 at 18:04, Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
On Wed, 2003-12-03 at 07:57, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
When I do it now it seems to accelerate... it starts slow but becomes
much faster...
Does that sound like being caused by the anticipated scheduler ?
What I don't
On Wed, 2003-12-03 at 07:30, Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
On Tue, 2003-12-02 at 23:20, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Tue, 2003-12-02 at 23:13, Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
On Mon, 2003-12-01 at 23:38, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
[...]
What do you mean ? There is no way the new radeonfb would
On Wed, 2003-12-03 at 10:29, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Wed, 2003-12-03 at 07:30, Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
On Tue, 2003-12-02 at 23:20, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Tue, 2003-12-02 at 23:13, Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
On Mon, 2003-12-01 at 23:38, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
[...]
When I do it now it seems to accelerate... it starts slow but becomes
much faster...
Does that sound like being caused by the anticipated scheduler ?
What I don't understand is why the cpu is at 100% while it was not with
2.4.
You have CONFIG_PREEMPT ? If yes, then don't look further for
On Tue, 2003-12-02 at 23:20, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Tue, 2003-12-02 at 23:13, Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
On Mon, 2003-12-01 at 23:38, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
[...]
What do you mean ? There is no way the new radeonfb would be slower
than the old one in 2.6. If you run in 8bpp,
On Wed, 2003-12-03 at 07:57, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
When I do it now it seems to accelerate... it starts slow but becomes
much faster...
Does that sound like being caused by the anticipated scheduler ?
What I don't understand is why the cpu is at 100% while it was not with
2.4.
On Mon, 2003-12-01 at 23:38, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
Do you have X running ? Same problem if not ? Does the screen come back
up at all or not ?
I've been doing some more tests and the results are random. I tried three
ways of suspending the machine:
1.- Closing the lid
On Tue, 2003-12-02 at 23:13, Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
On Mon, 2003-12-01 at 23:38, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
Do you have X running ? Same problem if not ? Does the screen come back
up at all or not ?
I've been doing some more tests and the results are random. I tried three
El Lunes, 1 de Diciembre de 2003 05:54, Benjamin Herrenschmidt escribió:
It's indeed strange, I would have expected this config to work fine.
I've also been trying enabling I2C with similar results.
Do you have X running ? Same problem if not ? Does the screen come back
up at all or not ?
P.S: I always wondered where the kernel developers or the system daemons
(i.e. pbbuttonsd and pmud) developres found the ADB and PMU specs to
interact with the respective devices.
I'd guess it's by looking at Darwin code. Sorry I can't help more...
--
Colin
Ne disez pas disez, mais disez
Do you have X running ? Same problem if not ? Does the screen come back
up at all or not ?
I've been doing some more tests and the results are random. I tried three
ways of suspending the machine:
1.- Closing the lid (pmud).
2.- Issuing the snooze command (pmud-utils).
3.- Some code
On Mon, 2003-12-01 at 14:05, Domingo Fiesta Segura wrote:
Hello all,
Although is not a Debian-specific matter, I believe this is the place to
ask. I have a G3 Ibook with radeon (more details below). Recently I
switched to 2.6 branch (rsyncing to source.mvista.com) because I wanted to
22 matches
Mail list logo
