On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 06:59:28PM -0700, Zack Weinberg wrote:
I'm one of the maintainers of the Debian package of monotone; I'm also
one of its upstream developers. For the new 0.36-1 package presently
in unstable, we decided to run the program's testsuite during the
build. This found
On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 06:59:28PM -0700, Zack Weinberg wrote:
I'm one of the maintainers of the Debian package of monotone; I'm also
one of its upstream developers. For the new 0.36-1 package presently
in unstable, we decided to run the program's testsuite during the
build. This found
Zack Weinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm one of the maintainers of the Debian package of monotone; I'm also
one of its upstream developers. For the new 0.36-1 package presently
in unstable, we decided to run the program's testsuite during the
build. This found failures on many
I'm one of the maintainers of the Debian package of monotone; I'm also
one of its upstream developers. For the new 0.36-1 package presently
in unstable, we decided to run the program's testsuite during the
build. This found failures on many architectures - a mixed blessing,
since on the one hand
On 9/3/07, Zack Weinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This message is going out to all the porter lists for which the
monotone package presently FTBFS because of testsuite failures. I am
not a DD (the package is being sponsored by Ludovic Brenta) so I do
not have access to any of the Debian
5 matches
Mail list logo