Re: Work to be done on ppc64el before the release (or even before)

2014-09-22 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
On 09/16/2014 12:45 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote: atlas FTBFS, we don't seem to have a patch for this one bzr #760054 - Not specific to ppc64el gaucheFTBFS, we don't seem to have a patch for this one gccxmlFTBFS, we don't seem to have a patch for this one

Re: Work to be done on ppc64el before the release (or even before)

2014-09-22 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 03:26:56PM -0300, Mauricio Faria de Oliveira wrote: On 09/16/2014 12:45 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote: atlas FTBFS, we don't seem to have a patch for this one bzr #760054 - Not specific to ppc64el gaucheFTBFS, we don't seem to have a patch for this

Re: Work to be done on ppc64el before the release (or even before)

2014-09-21 Thread Bastian Blank
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 05:48:51PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: A quick note about this one. Andi Barth has started to debug that, and I have continued a bit. The following code doesn't work correctly on ppc64el, printing twice a positive value. This exact behaviour is tested in the boost

Work to be done on ppc64el before the release (or even before)

2014-09-16 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Hi all, The architecture qualification meeting last Sunday has decided that arm64 and ppc64el will be in principle released with Jessie. This means that they will be released providing enough progress is done before the release (and ideally before the freeze). On the hardware side things seems

Re: Work to be done on ppc64el before the release (or even before)

2014-09-16 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 05:45:45PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: On the packages side the status is quite good and a big part of the build failures are for leaf packages that might not fully necessary for the release (and some of them also will not be in Jessie as they have RC bugs). We should

Re: Work to be done on ppc64el before the release (or even before)

2014-09-16 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
On 09/16/2014 12:48 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote: bugs). We should still try to fix them if possible. I have tried to identify packages that are important either because of the functionality they provide or because the number of packages which build-depends on them. Here is a first list: Many

Re: Work to be done on ppc64el before the release (or even before)

2014-09-16 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
On 09/16/2014 01:08 PM, Mauricio Faria de Oliveira wrote: libkolabxml FTBFS, seems to be a problem with boost::math::changesign [...] For this one, I'm asking someone who should known Boost for ppc64/el well. Submitted #761926 (boost1.55) and #761934 (libkolabxml symbols). -- Mauricio