Re: mozilla 0.8 from penguinppc and PSM

2001-02-22 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Wed, 21 Feb 2001, Ethan Benson wrote: even if export regulations are a problem that does not preclude properly merging the source in such a way that it can be distributed as an actual patch to the mozilla source tree, much in the same way as the international kernel patch works. (the int

Re: mozilla 0.8 from penguinppc and PSM

2001-02-22 Thread Ethan Benson
On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 08:17:16AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: On Wed, 21 Feb 2001, Ethan Benson wrote: even if export regulations are a problem that does not preclude properly merging the source in such a way that it can be distributed as an actual patch to the mozilla source tree,

Re: mozilla 0.8 from penguinppc and PSM

2001-02-22 Thread jeramy b smith
Would someone like to post potato comaptible debs of stuff like moz and other newer/cooler stuff? Kevin Puetz has posted some debs of X at one time before the ppc diffs made it into woody and people enjoyed using them. I've even told Hadess I would host his Ximian stuff if he wanted. Just

Re: mozilla 0.8 from penguinppc and PSM

2001-02-22 Thread Ethan Benson
On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 04:49:53AM -0500, jeramy b smith wrote: Would someone like to post potato comaptible debs of stuff like moz and other newer/cooler stuff? someone should really get in touch with the debian mozilla maintainer and find out if he plans to package 0.8, or anything newer

Re: mozilla 0.8 from penguinppc and PSM

2001-02-22 Thread Wilhelm *Rafial* Fitzpatrick
Umm, it works pretty ok for me. It is stable too I think, I dont really see much crashes. I just took the build from mozilla.org that includes PSM and dumped into my homedir and ran it from there. Loading regular HTTP pages works fine for me, and I agree it is fairly stable (no worse than

Re: mozilla 0.8 from penguinppc and PSM

2001-02-22 Thread Tuomas Kuosmanen
On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 09:10:10AM -0800, thus said Wilhelm *Rafial* Fitzpatrick: Umm, it works pretty ok for me. It is stable too I think, I dont really see much crashes. I just took the build from mozilla.org that includes PSM and dumped into my homedir and ran it from there. Loading

mozilla 0.8 from penguinppc and PSM

2001-02-21 Thread Wilhelm Fitzpatrick
I'm still trying to get PSM to work with the mozilla 0.8 rpms downloaded from penguinppc.org. So far I have: 1) alien installed mozilla.rpm -at this point mozilla wouldn't put a window up on the screen 2) I ran the postinstall script that Ethan provided in his email as root -mozilla

Re: mozilla 0.8 from penguinppc and PSM

2001-02-21 Thread jeramy b smith
I am not really sure if these packages work alien'ed or not. I built them but make no claims that they do anything but render regular pages. -jeramy b smith Wilhelm Fitzpatrick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm still trying to get PSM to work with the mozilla 0.8 rpms downloaded from

Re: mozilla 0.8 from penguinppc and PSM

2001-02-21 Thread Wilhelm Fitzpatrick
On Wed, 21 Feb 2001, jeramy b smith wrote: I am not really sure if these packages work alien'ed or not. I built them but make no claims that they do anything but render regular pages. Well, does the psm package work when installed on, say, LinuxPPC or Yellow Dog?

Re: mozilla 0.8 from penguinppc and PSM

2001-02-21 Thread Wilhelm Fitzpatrick
Okay, I now I'm thinking that mozilla 0.8 w/PSM might just not work on Debian. I removed the rpm versions of moz 0.8, replaced them with the tar.gz build off mozilla.org (which includes PSM), installed in my home directory so mozilla can scribble wherever it wants, and I get all the same errors.

Re: mozilla 0.8 from penguinppc and PSM

2001-02-21 Thread Ethan Benson
On Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 12:27:18PM -0800, Wilhelm Fitzpatrick wrote: I'm still trying to get PSM to work with the mozilla 0.8 rpms downloaded from penguinppc.org. So far I have: sortof offtopic but i thought that the psm code was Freed when RSA's patent expired and thus could be merged into

Re: mozilla 0.8 from penguinppc and PSM

2001-02-21 Thread jeramy b smith
US Export Regulations I think. Also, moz is being stripped down into smaller packages so try to isolate the browser component more. There are some people who don't want mail, development headers, or e-commerce security. -Jeramy B Smith Ethan Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Feb 21,

Re: mozilla 0.8 from penguinppc and PSM

2001-02-21 Thread Ethan Benson
On Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 09:00:10PM -0500, jeramy b smith wrote: US Export Regulations I think. Also, moz is being stripped down into smaller packages so try to isolate the browser component more. There are some people who don't want mail, development headers, or e-commerce security. as i

Re: mozilla 0.8 from penguinppc and PSM

2001-02-21 Thread Steven Hanley
On Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 05:12:59PM -0900, Ethan Benson wrote: and kitchen sink client. they integrated emacs into mozilla? ahh the joy g See You Steve -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://wibble.net/~sjh Look Up In The Sky Is it a bird? No Is it a planeNo

Re: mozilla 0.8 from penguinppc and PSM

2001-02-21 Thread \(sp\)
On 21 Feb 2001 16:33:32 -0800, Wilhelm Fitzpatrick wrote: Okay, I now I'm thinking that mozilla 0.8 w/PSM might just not work on Debian. I removed the rpm versions of moz 0.8, replaced them with the Umm, it works pretty ok for me. It is stable too I think, I dont really see much crashes. I

Re: mozilla 0.8 from penguinppc and PSM

2001-02-21 Thread Phil Fraering
On 21 Feb 2001 17:12:59 -0900, Ethan Benson wrote: as for breaking mozilla into smaller peices that is excellent news. i for one just want the browser not the crappy mail, news, irc, and kitchen sink client. Have you tried skipstone yet? It's in debian, and it's neat. Still missing a