Re: porting troubles

2000-10-05 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Wed, 4 Oct 2000, Michael Schmitz wrote: SB Out of blue, why is that Linux now runs stable on six (6) SB different platforms but commercial software like Star, SB Corel, Adobe and IBM, just to mention a few, are only SB available for ix86? Are there any political or

Re: porting troubles

2000-10-05 Thread Michael Schmitz
And sloppy programming includes the tendency (of companies doing a quick Linux port) to use Wine (not even winelib) to make regular windows applications run on Linux. Seen that with Corel, and it wasn't a bit pretty in the beginning. Seeing that no company is willing to dedicate enough

Re: porting troubles

2000-10-05 Thread Hadess
Quoting Michael Schmitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]: And sloppy programming includes the tendency (of companies doing a quick Linux port) to use Wine (not even winelib) to make regular windows applications run on Linux. Seen that with Corel, and it wasn't a bit pretty in the beginning. Seeing

Re: porting troubles

2000-10-05 Thread Michael Schmitz
Wine so the code may be unportable. There's still enough in the way of windowmanager-Corel interaction to make you cry). Using wine as a porting library is not x86 specific. Companies could use it to quickly port to Linux, testing the response from the community and then doing a

Re: porting troubles

2000-10-05 Thread Sergio Brandano
And M$ just acquired 25% of the shares of Corel, which resulted in a raise of 57% for Corel on the stock market... Oh dear! This means that Microsoft Linux is a reality now. There is no escape! We are tosted! :-P Sergio

Re: porting troubles

2000-10-05 Thread Hadess
Quoting Michael Schmitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Wine so the code may be unportable. There's still enough in the way of windowmanager-Corel interaction to make you cry). Using wine as a porting library is not x86 specific. Companies could use it to quickly port to Linux, testing the

porting troubles

2000-10-04 Thread Sergio Brandano
Hi, Out of blue, why is that Linux now runs stable on six (6) different platforms but commercial software like Star, Corel, Adobe and IBM, just to mention a few, are only available for ix86? Are there any political or technical reasons for it? Sergio

Re: porting troubles

2000-10-04 Thread C.M. Connelly
SB == Sergio Brandano [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: SB Out of blue, why is that Linux now runs stable on six (6) SB different platforms but commercial software like Star, SB Corel, Adobe and IBM, just to mention a few, are only SB available for ix86? Are there any political or technical

Re: porting troubles

2000-10-04 Thread Michael Schmitz
SB Out of blue, why is that Linux now runs stable on six (6) SB different platforms but commercial software like Star, SB Corel, Adobe and IBM, just to mention a few, are only SB available for ix86? Are there any political or technical SB reasons for it? There are some

Re: porting troubles

2000-10-04 Thread Nelson Abramson
Sergio Brandano wrote: Out of blue, why is that Linux now runs stable on six (6) different platforms but commercial software like Star, Corel, Adobe and IBM, just to mention a few, are only available for ix86? Are there any political or technical reasons for it? heavily biased Because

Re: porting troubles

2000-10-04 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Wed, 4 Oct 2000, Sergio Brandano wrote: Out of blue, why is that Linux now runs stable on six (6) different Only 6? :-) platforms but commercial software like Star, Corel, Adobe and IBM, just to mention a few, are only available for ix86? Are there any political or technical reasons