On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 09:01:26PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Are they developing new powerpc products?
AMCC? I have no idea. Maybe not. Freescale certainly seems to be.
> Their latest products are also pretty ARM.
That they are.
> Are you talking about new e6500 SoCs, or are you only
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 01:30:13PM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 11:18:39PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > Freescala/NXP is not even on the OpenPOWER member list - this is not the
> > old power.org
>
> Neither is AMCC as far as I can tell. Doesn't mean they aren't
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 11:18:39PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Freescala/NXP is not even on the OpenPOWER member list - this is not the
> old power.org
Neither is AMCC as far as I can tell. Doesn't mean they aren't still
doing powerpc.
> For their network processors Freescala/NXP is moving
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 03:58:21PM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 03:54:43PM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> > I think Freescala/NXP might disagree. Not sure if the e6500 core could
> > ruin ppc64el or not, but they certainly make a lot of powerpc chips.
>
> That
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 03:54:43PM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> I think Freescala/NXP might disagree. Not sure if the e6500 core could
> ruin ppc64el or not, but they certainly make a lot of powerpc chips.
That should have said 'run' not 'ruin'. That would have been rather
interesting
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 10:22:14PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MeeGo#Companies_supporting_the_project
>
> That's also an impressive list of companies, isn't it?
> When the one company that mattered switched to a different platform,
> the whole platform collapsed
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 12:06:59PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Hi,
Hi Aurelien,
>...
> To me it looks like they are really skilled for that job. Do you have
> actual facts showing the contrary?
Niels said that I shouldn't hesitate to let the release team know when
I believe there is an issue
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 09:06:14AM -0200, Breno Leitao wrote:
> Hello Adrian,
Hi Breno,
> Let me share my view as the only DD listed as ppc64el porter.
thanks for your reply.
Just to state it explicitely in case that was not clear, I do not have
any problem with you personally or the ppc64el
Hello Adrian,
Let me share my view as the only DD listed as ppc64el porter.
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 10:50:01PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Is a DM enough, if the only DD gets killed by a car [2] the day after
> the release of stretch?
The other DM is in the process of becoming a DD[1]. This
Hi,
On 2016-10-17 22:50, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Disclaimer:
> I am not a member of the release team, and I am only speaking for myself.
>
>
> The architecture requalification status for stretch [1] lists the
> ppc64el porter situation as green, but there are three reasons w
Disclaimer:
I am not a member of the release team, and I am only speaking for myself.
The architecture requalification status for stretch [1] lists the
ppc64el porter situation as green, but there are three reasons why
the situation doesn't look that good to me.
First, official status
11 matches
Mail list logo