Hi Bas,
Thank you. Could you please upload the libm when you are finished with
compiling? I would like to test it on my Cyrus board.
Thanks,
Christian
On 06 February 2018 at 6:18PM, Bas Vermeulen wrote:
Hi Christian,
I am running into a similar problem with my T2080 (using an e6500).
I'm
On 02/06/2018 07:22 PM, Bas Vermeulen wrote:
> I just checked gcc's configure, and that doesn't take --with-cpu= as an
> argument. It doesn't fail when it has it, but it doesn't actually do anything
> with it
> either.
> So my patch would be the correct way to handle this.
That's because you
I am evaluating the following patch to gcc-7 to fix the problem. It's
currently building, I'll follow up when I know it works. The patch is added
to debian/rules.patch to get it included.
Bas Vermeulen
On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 5:16 PM, Lennart Sorensen <
lsore...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> wrote:
> On
On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 06:58:55PM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> It would be nice if anyone who cares about the ppc64 could actually
> post what kind of hardware they have. We should find a consensus on
> where to put the baseline.
Well at least the CPUs listed on
On 02/06/2018 06:03 PM, Bas Vermeulen wrote:
> Mostly because I didn't know/think of that. But you are right, that would be
> better.
So, the file you want to modify is:
> https://sources.debian.org/src/gcc-7/7.3.0-1/debian/rules2/#L380-L392
It would be nice if anyone who cares about the ppc64
I just checked gcc's configure, and that doesn't take --with-cpu= as an
argument. It doesn't fail when it has it, but it doesn't actually do
anything with it either.
So my patch would be the correct way to handle this.
Bas Vermeulen
On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 6:58 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <
I get that. But configure in the gcc sources doesn't actually process
those. So while they are in rules2, it doesn't actually change anything.
See
https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/blob/da8dff89fa9398f04b107e388cb706517ced9505/configure
and search for with-cpu (which would catch both
On 02/06/2018 07:29 PM, Bas Vermeulen wrote:
> I get that. But configure in the gcc sources doesn't actually process those.
> So while they are in rules2, it doesn't actually change anything.
>
> SeeĀ
> https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/blob/da8dff89fa9398f04b107e388cb706517ced9505/configure
>
Hi All,
I use Debian Buster/Sid PPC64 on my Cyrus board with a P5020 SoC [1].
The E5500 fpu doesn't have a fpsqrt instruction. Does Debian's libm have
support for emulation of the fpsqrt instruction?
Thanks,
Christian
[1]
On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 03:40:20PM +0100, Bas Vermeulen wrote:
> I am trying to run the ppc64 unstable on a Freescale T2080, which uses the
> e6500 CPU. Running python (or any other application using sqrt or sqrtf)
> will cause an illegal instruction exception, because the sqrtf opcode is
> not
> On Feb 6, 2018, at 5:26 PM, Bas Vermeulen wrote:
>
> I am evaluating the following patch to gcc-7 to fix the problem. It's
> currently building, I'll follow up when I know it works. The patch is added
> to debian/rules.patch to get it included.
Why do you want to patch
Hi Christian,
I am running into a similar problem with my T2080 (using an e6500). I'm
currently rebuilding gcc to build for powerpc64 by default, eliminating
those from being generated by default. Once that is done, I'll have to
rebuild glibc with the new gcc compiler to update libm.
Bas
Hi,
I am trying to run the ppc64 unstable on a Freescale T2080, which uses the
e6500 CPU. Running python (or any other application using sqrt or sqrtf)
will cause an illegal instruction exception, because the sqrtf opcode is
not supported on the e6500.
This seems to be caused by gcc compiling
Mostly because I didn't know/think of that. But you are right, that would
be better.
Bas Vermeulen
On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 5:48 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <
glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de> wrote:
>
>
> On Feb 6, 2018, at 5:26 PM, Bas Vermeulen wrote:
>
> I am evaluating the
14 matches
Mail list logo