On 14/06/16 09:06, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 07:33:56PM +, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> Philipp Kern:
>>> On 2016-06-05 12:01, Niels Thykier wrote:
* amd64, i386, armel, armhf, arm64, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el,
s390x
- *No* blockers at this time from RT
On 16/06/16 02:12, Hector Oron wrote:
> I have put up the classical wiki page for Stretch at:
> https://wiki.debian.org/ArchiveQualification/Stretch
>
> Please review and comment if required.
That page is now outdated wrt mips concerns (see below). Do we need to duplicate
the information that w
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 11/04/18 11:12, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
>
>
> On 11/04/2018 10:07, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>> On 04/11/2018 10:53 AM, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
>>> As of 3.0.1, openmpi now works on Big-Endian powerpc (which was to be a
>>> problem; it had been dropped up
On 25/07/14 01:14, peter green wrote:
> When you are added to testing you will be added as a "broken and fucked"
> (release team's terminology not mine) architecture. To get out of this state
> you
> will need to get and keep your port in a healthy state in testing. That will
> mean fixing (in som
On 28/07/14 22:35, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 25/07/14 01:14, peter green wrote:
>> When you are added to testing you will be added as a "broken and fucked"
>> (release team's terminology not mine) architecture. To get out of this state
>> you
>>
[ Sorry for the cross-post, but I believe the people in -release and -wb-team
should see this ]
On 23/10/15 09:05, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Hi,
>
> whoever is scheduling binNMUs now should do so with a little
> bit more care, please.
>
> Case in point, frameworkintegration – x32 already was rebu
On 23/10/15 11:20, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Oct 2015, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>
>> I can go back to scheduling binNMUs for release architectures only, or for
>> ANY
>> -x32. But I don't have the time to look at every architecture and determine
&g
On 23/10/15 12:23, Wookey wrote:
> +++ Emilio Pozuelo Monfort [2015-10-23 11:49 +0200]:
>> On 23/10/15 11:20, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
>
>>> How about, scheduling them all at once, but using the same version
>>> number across arches when doing it (i.e. the larges
On 23/10/15 13:02, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Oct 2015, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>
>> wanna-build does, yes, but at least the Release Team tend to use the "wb"
>> wrapper tool which automatically works out the next free number on each
>> architecture.
>
> Ah, cool – so we have only to patc
On 23/10/15 13:21, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 23/10/15 13:02, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
>> On Fri, 23 Oct 2015, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>>
>>> wanna-build does, yes, but at least the Release Team tend to use the "wb"
>>> wrapper tool which automatic
10 matches
Mail list logo
