Bug#732555: ghostscript: gs 9.05 doesn't handle slightly broken pdf file as well as gs 9.10

Jonas Smedegaard writes: > Your own tests indicate that indeed a newer gs is a fix for this bug. > Please, however, let's discuss only the actual bug in this bugreport. Sure. I just didn't want others to waste time trying to debug something that has been fixed upstream. > A separate bugreport

Bug#732555: ghostscript: gs 9.05 doesn't handle slightly broken pdf file as well as gs 9.10

Hi Sanjoy, Quoting Sanjoy Mahajan (2013-12-18 19:51:21) > Thus, as a fix (or workaround for a somewhat dubious pdf file), could > gs be upgraded to 9.10? Thanks for filing this bugreport. Your own tests indicate that indeed a newer gs is a fix for this bug. Please, however, let's discuss only