On 01/25/2011 08:27 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Another argument for keeping libijs separate:
I consider packaging GNU Ghostscript, which seem to have a slightly
different development pace and thus might be interesting e.g. for
security concerned users, and would also make the recent RC issue
On 01/25/2011 09:48 PM, Roger Leigh wrote:
Just for the record, I think there should be *one* copy of ijs only.
I really don't care whether it's in ijs or gs. However, given that
gs is required for ijs to work, and the copy in gs has had some
maintenance, I think the gs copy would be the better
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
#hplip (3.11.1-1) experimental; urgency=low
#
# * New Upstream Release
#- Fixes CVE-2010-4267: Buffer overflow (Closes: #610960)
#
limit source hplip
Limiting to bugs with field 'source' containing at least one of 'hplip'
Limit currently
On 01/25/2011 10:04 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
I think perhaps you miss my point:
If libijs is maintained for Debian as part of the GPL Ghostscript
project, and we also (in the future) maintain GNU Ghostscript, then GNU
Ghostscript will need to depend on GPL Ghostscript, making it impossible
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 07:58:12PM +0100, Till Kamppeter wrote:
On 01/25/2011 10:04 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
I think perhaps you miss my point:
If libijs is maintained for Debian as part of the GPL Ghostscript
project, and we also (in the future) maintain GNU Ghostscript, then
GNU
Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 01:13:21PM -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
I'd like it. apt's heuristics are kind of goofy, and if I
understand correctly then removing Breaks removes a small chance
of apt getting confused and deciding to remove ghostscript as part
of an
found 440478 ghostscript/8.62.dfsg.1-3.2lenny5
quit
paolo wrote:
2011/1/23 Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com:
Do you know of a ghostscript version that did not have this problem?
(That could make life very easy.)
nope, all gs I've installed so far (but am still on Lenny as most updated
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
found 440478 ghostscript/8.62.dfsg.1-3.2lenny5
Bug #440478 [ghostscript] gs-esp: hangs at ~98% CPU with DEVICE=bbox reading a
.ps from tiff2ps
Bug Marked as found in versions ghostscript/8.62.dfsg.1-3.2lenny5.
quit
Stopping processing here.
Your message dated Thu, 27 Jan 2011 00:17:20 +
with message-id e1pify8-0007iw...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#610960: fixed in hplip 3.11.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #610960,
regarding CVE-2010-4267: Buffer overflow
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 00:26:43 +1100
Source: hplip
Binary: hplip hplip-data hplip-gui hplip-dbg hplip-doc hpijs-ppds hpijs
hplip-cups libhpmud0 libhpmud-dev libsane-hpaio
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 3.11.1-1
Distribution:
10 matches
Mail list logo